Re: War of the Roses : Wed Nov 06, 2024 6:41 pm  

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... e-30313586

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... e-30313586

Re: War of the Roses : Wed Nov 06, 2024 6:45 pm  

So the owners don’t want it if that’s how I’m reading it. But the sport is happy to pay IMG a fortune but not listen to them. And yet they whine a lot there is no money

Re: War of the Roses : Wed Nov 06, 2024 7:52 pm  

karetaker wrote:

So the owners don’t want it if that’s how I’m reading it. But the sport is happy to pay IMG a fortune but not listen to them. And yet they whine a lot there is no money

Instead we are having a bye round. How inspired.

Re: War of the Roses : Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:07 pm  

Wires71 wrote:

Instead we are having a bye round. How inspired.

Over 2 weekends which means to me it benefits the teams that are off in the 2nd week

Re: War of the Roses : Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:26 pm  

karetaker wrote:

Jesus I’m starting to sound like Smiffy27 but are we not as you say flogging a dead horse now with how it is.

Thanks karetaker
I really wouldn't have England v France (with half an England team playing France) or a Lancs v Yorks game. Clubs don't want it, speccies don't want it ... we all don't want it. You can't whip up false enthusiasm that is not there. Flaming pointless. Daft idea no matter who came up with it. Playing in half empty stadiums does the game no good & an extra few hours for half the team listening to our esteemed coach won't help us beat the Aussies.