Re: How bad were Bradford??? : Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:46 pm  

the original stevo wrote:

or did we make em look bad???????

If that is the case, then there has been a lot of teams making them look bad

Re: How bad were Bradford??? : Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:49 pm  

Dawson wrote:

If that is the case, then there has been a lot of teams making them look bad

get your point but nobody has put that many points on them and certainly not leeds

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:15 pm  

Only Warrington fans would push the angle of how poor the opposition were as oppose to crediting their team. I don't know how some folk on here get through life, tiny things must be a trauma, supa hot day,you buy a bloody can of coke, drink it, it quenshes your thirst, then look on the back,

'If you are not fully satisfied with this product, please write to the following address within 14 days'.

Dear Coca Cola,

I enjoyed my fizzy, bubble filled cola drink, but didn't feel fully satisfied. My dissatisfaction stems from the fact that I enjoyed the drink because I was thirsty, and not that the coca cola was refreshing. With this in mind, please refund my 52p to the following back account.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:20 pm  

Bradford were very very poor, it would be ludicrous to suggest otherwise, but equally it was a very similar Bradford team to the one that beat Leeds and ran Wakey very close. I think it's right that we take a lot of the credit for destroying them at sOdall, but we shouldn't start thinking that we have 'turned the corner' and are going to start surging up the league.

IMO our next three league games (Hudds at home, Rovers in Edinburgh then Hull away) will give a far better indication of how much, if at all, we have improved.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:30 pm  

Bradford were poor, we were good. That simple.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:39 pm  

bradford were poor cos wire made them look poor ,they had no ball and no one knows how that feels more than us .lets give credit to the boys when we had the ball this week we put points on the board .we got in there faces and bashed them .they beat leeds last game so they not that bad eh .for god sake we won and played well sick of how bad they were and if they would have had this and that .warrington played realy well end of lets enjoy the moment

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:20 pm  

I'm not one for stats, and I think its more of a term used in Tennis, but what was Bradford's 'unforced errors' total?...

Yes, you then have to capitalise on these errors, and we certainly did that well, but to those suggesting that it was our play that forced the errors might be a bit misleading.

That opening try of the second half was a classic example...it was 100% the fault of a Bradford cock-up and had balls-all to do with any Wire pressure.....Similarly, Hicks' hat-trick try, when one of their guys knocks on in junior school style, Briers picks up and feeds Hicks, and Bradford's defence parts like the Red Sea...

Yes, we jumped on their errors, but a lot of our points were gifted and required little effort to score.

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:24 pm  

The Angry Pirate wrote:

That opening try of the second half was a classic example...it was 100% the fault of a Bradford cock-up and had balls-all to do with any Wire pressure

I'd say 90% brainfart and 10% the wire chase and quick reactions of Higham to get to the ball first

: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:28 pm  

Jesus Of Suburbia wrote:

I'd say 90% brainfart and 10% the wire chase and quick reactions of Higham to get to the ball first

Quick reactions of Higham or the fact 5 Bradford players are looking like mongs wondering which 1 of them can be arsed to do something sensible, like simply ground the ball, or hammer the ball dead.

It was a complete joke, and if you saw that on any amateur rugby pitch you'd be wetting yourself at the sheer farcical nature of it all...