LincolnDEVILSFan wrote:
I'm in agreement Jaymc9. We are all used to getting let down, but let's not get carried away.
There were some positives. Stapo was looking very dynamic in his second spell and seemed to cause problems. When Casmere took the ball at pace he too was a handful. Parker and Adamson worked really hard and Big Phil ran hard and always seemed capable of an offload.
We may have been out played and out smarted in the first half, but never felt the Pack was out of it's depth. Would possibly say we had better pack, a bonus that I cannot remember us ever having in the Super League era.
As long as the backs perform better over the next few weeks we should start to look like a good team.
There were some positives. Stapo was looking very dynamic in his second spell and seemed to cause problems. When Casmere took the ball at pace he too was a handful. Parker and Adamson worked really hard and Big Phil ran hard and always seemed capable of an offload.
We may have been out played and out smarted in the first half, but never felt the Pack was out of it's depth. Would possibly say we had better pack, a bonus that I cannot remember us ever having in the Super League era.
As long as the backs perform better over the next few weeks we should start to look like a good team.
exactly.
from what i seen our pack should be able to cope with most teams, it's just our back that will have to start throwing it about before 50 minutes. when we get going i think we could go on a good run
if people expect us to lose before we play they won't be dissapointed when we do will they.
I'm happy with 2 things yesterday, the way we played after half time (even though we didn't score enough) and our support we took. don't get too many away games but i was encouraged with how many of us there was.