Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:41 pm  

Red John wrote:

Didn't Cas go public to say they'd opened negotiations with Salford, only for Marwan to deny any such negotiations had taken place?

So we're lemmings; there were only 50 of us; we taunted Cas fans all the way through the match; our chairman was in his element (and you could see that from your vantage point), but it's Salford that have an issue with Castleford

And yes, we cheered Rangi. A bit. We didn't have a whole lot else to cheer last season.

you don't this season either

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:43 pm  

boothdaz wrote:

:ASS: you don't this season either

We're saving them all for next year.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:48 pm  

boothdaz wrote:

I really fail to understand why Salford have such an issue with Castleford over Syned. I don't recall and comments made by the coach, coaching staff, players or chairman relating to Sneyd. The only comments made have been on twitter between your chairman and supporters, which lets be honest, shouldn't be happening anyway.
Last year, you took our prize asset which devastated most of the Cas supporters, your chairman rounded up around 50 lemmings and taunted all the Cas supporters all the way through the Cas Salford fixture last season. I have never been to a match where the opposition supporters cheered more for our players than we do. This was in bad taste and your owner was in his element. It seems this may be reversed this year. So be it!!

Maybe the answer was not to let all your nobber fan element run rampant on the issue. I think the sheer number of ridiculous, offensive, mardy, gobshite supporters has actually made MK dig his heels in. Whether you like it or not. Whether you agree with him or not. Life's not fair and he holds all the cards.

Yes, it wasn't right parading Chase while he was at Cas, or winding-up your supporters. Like I said, life isn't fair. The roles wont be reversed this year as most Salford supporters would be sorry to see Marc go, but the replacements we've got mean that there probably wont be many tears shed for a player who's heart is elsewhere. Plus, your Club needs to find some dosh on the issue.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:11 am  

boothdaz wrote:

I really fail to understand why Salford have such an issue with Castleford over Syned. I don't recall and comments made by the coach, coaching staff, players or chairman relating to Sneyd. The only comments made have been on twitter between your chairman and supporters, which lets be honest, shouldn't be happening anyway.

Have a look at the hashtag #FreeMarcSneyd on Twitter. Have a look at the Free Marc Sneyd page on Facebook. They aren't being run by Salford fans (aside from the pisstaking on Twitter) and it is Cas supporters making themselves look pitiful.

boothdaz wrote:

Last year, you took our prize asset which devastated most of the Cas supporters, your chairman rounded up around 50 lemmings and taunted all the Cas supporters all the way through the Cas Salford fixture last season. I have never been to a match where the opposition supporters cheered more for our players than we do. This was in bad taste and your owner was in his element. It seems this may be reversed this year. So be it!!

Really? I wasn't stood in the middle of Koukash and friends, but I was stood just to the right and there was a sarcastic "Chase will tear you apart next year" towards the end of the game. Funnily enough, even the Cas fans stood around us were laughing at that one. You precious little darling, you.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:10 am  

Red John wrote:

Dunno, but I bet he plays for Leigh.

Ryan Brierley. But I doubt that Leigh will let him go.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:58 am  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Red John wrote:

Dunno, but I bet he plays for Leigh.

Ryan Brierley. But I doubt that Leigh will let him go.

You're forgetting Marwan's incredible powers of persuasion ("Will a cheque do?").

Interesting thing is, they seem serious over this four half-back thing. When they first said it, I thought they were just using coded language for "Well, if you want Marc, you're going to have to pay for him."

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:11 pm  

Red John wrote:

You're forgetting Marwan's incredible powers of persuasion ("Will a cheque do?").

Interesting thing is, they seem serious over this four half-back thing. When they first said it, I thought they were just using coded language for "Well, if you want Marc, you're going to have to pay for him."

I think four halves is overkill but I get the impression that one of them will be bit part cover in the hooking role, Theo while not being a world beater there looked more than capable and for me would improve with specialist training and more experience.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:13 pm  

Red John wrote:

You're forgetting Marwan's incredible powers of persuasion ("Will a cheque do?").

Interesting thing is, they seem serious over this four half-back thing. When they first said it, I thought they were just using coded language for "Well, if you want Marc, you're going to have to pay for him."

It'll be a fairly big cheque then for Brierley. Four half-backs in a team is quite unusual but there's no reason why a team can't have that many. But I'd not be too thrilled if I was a half-back and there was a surplus of them. I do wonder how much Dr. Koukash wants us to pay Salford for Marc Sneyd ?

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:04 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

It'll be a fairly big cheque then for Brierley...... I do wonder how much Dr. Koukash wants us to pay Salford for Marc Sneyd ?

Hmm, that's interesting, based on your own logic, it should be a fairly big (maybe even a slightly bigger) cheque for Marc then shouldn't it?

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:59 pm  

Always behind the sticks wrote:

Hmm, that's interesting, based on your own logic, it should be a fairly big (maybe even a slightly bigger) cheque for Marc then shouldn't it?

Oh no !!!