Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Sat May 07, 2016 8:35 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I just stated an observation that he's nowhere near fit enough to play at this standard

No you didn't. Mario did

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Sun May 08, 2016 9:55 am  

Gadger wrote:

I am fine with negative comments or constructive criticism where it's due, and jeez its due today, but to blame vidot is spineless. For the reasons I've already mentioned. .

FLAT STANLEY Wrote: A spade is a spade, I don't give two Tom Tits what you lot think. If you want the diluted drivel you know where to go. And I ain't blaming Vidiot for the defeat, I just stated an observation that he's nowhere near fit enough to play at this standard. Denny Solomona had him in his pocket all afternoon.

The pack is nothing but spineless, and I'm sick of the same old cliches being tooted by the management. "Hopefully, we'll bounce back next week bollix''.

Gadger, Take a chill pill. you're twisting my words.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Sun May 08, 2016 10:42 am  

red in buxton wrote:

U2 Mario and FLAT need to p11s of this web site untill u can finding something good to say END OFF.

Oh Diddums, If there was anything positive to vent about Salford, I'd be the first to acknowledge the crux of the matter,If you can't handle the truth, and need a more of a diluted analysis, you know where to go.

red in buxton Wrote: Flat ????? Hve u ever been to watch a match live, or do u just watch the telly????

Who the hell are you to patronize my allegiance to Salford. I've been watching for 38 years,I'm born and Bred Salford. I should be patronizing you about deserting your beloved Salford.to go living in the interbreeding capital of Britain? The Butcher very rarely attends, he's never lived in Salford, not even from Salford. If you're questioning allegiances I should be last on your list.

red in buxton wrote: If u don't like how SALFORD play, p11s off and dont come back and take Mario with u.

Hahahaha, Strange fellow, you need a more diluted site badly. END OFF

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Sun May 08, 2016 11:15 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Gadger, Take a chill pill. you're twisting my words.

Don't need a pill but I am now more chilled I wasn't twisting your words, itp was aimed at marios comments

I've not seen vidot play enough to say he's going to be a world beater, but I certainly won't be judging him on that performance

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Sun May 08, 2016 11:52 am  

Gadger wrote:

Don't need a pill but I am now more chilled I wasn't twisting your words, itp was aimed at marios comments

I've not seen vidot play enough to say he's going to be a world beater, but I certainly won't be judging him on that performance

Whatever. With regards to Vidot, I'll give him a few weeks to improve his fitness. But what worries me especially with him being a three-quarter, is even when a decent player is unfit or returning from a lengthy layoff they often still somehow show glimpses or flashes of skill and evasiveness to which I struggled to observe with Vidot. Yes, it's his first game and I wasn't expecting him to pull up trees, but showing Zero potential and Zero flashes of any evasive footwork or the lack of any glimpses of his well-known reputation worry me. if he turns out to be another Justin Carney well I'll hold my hands up, but my intuition guides my adjudication towards another Junior Langi in disguise. Hope I'm wrong Gadger.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Mon May 09, 2016 7:22 am  

Occam's razor: he's not yet fit.
As you know from your decades of RL, there is a difference between fit and match fit. He's not at the second level yet.

I've an end-of-year appraisal coming up. Are either of you two available to ghost write it? Then the negatives could be listed and I could cast aroung for any positives from elsewhere?

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Tue May 10, 2016 8:19 am  

It's a team game.... some people seem to have missed that and continue to find fault and blame with individual players / officials / RFL.

It never seems to be our fault as a team or the fact that the 'team' were not good enough over 80 minutes.

Too many people who watch this game simply don't understand it.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Tue May 10, 2016 6:33 pm  

I liked the interview in the MEN today and I for one jumped on the bandwagon with regards to his performance. I was expecting him to add an x factor but the guy needs games. I don't think we will see the best of him till the bottom 8. But I expect his partnership with Jones to grow. We need to get back on the wagon and climb the league. The draw made me feel better as I wouldn't fancy playing Wigan next and now we have a weak cough.

Bring on the saints!!!

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Thu May 12, 2016 1:01 pm  

My query is why did he drop Evalds who seemed to be doing a decent job and scoring tries.Surely Vidot should have been coming off the bench.I think there seems to be a bit of an agenda with Niall and the coaching staff at the moment,whatever the rights and wrongs.

Re: Is Daniel Vidot all that? : Thu May 12, 2016 2:04 pm  

Just me who thought it was a decent performance for his first game of RL in 9 months? I thought he returned the ball well and his defending to prevent Solomona scoring that try (which ended up being awarded) was excellent. Yes he was out jumped by Solomona earlier in the game but he isn't the first winger and wont be the last either.

Another 80 minutes on Friday will do him the world of good.