Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:44 pm  

Request rejected

Request rejected

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:09 pm  

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... er-request marwan not happy with blease

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... er-request marwan not happy with blease

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:25 pm  

Are we likely to see a transfer bid for Sneyd from Cas? For some reason people seem to think Salford should just cave in and let him go for free. It will be interesting to see how much Cas value him at.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:28 pm  

Would prefer him too go anywhere but Castleford, I personally think he will go to a big club and have a genuine crack at becoming the future England/GB scrum half.

Bit underhand if he has been promising one thing to the club then throwing this in.

Rather than any transfer fee I'd be much happier to see some good young British talent come to the club from say a Wigan, Leeds or Saints.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:32 pm  

the red fusilier wrote:

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/12207/9353785/super-league-salford-red-devils-reject-marc-sneyds-transfer-request

marwan not happy with blease

I'm not surprised Marwan is upset, He's spent the last month or two telling everyone how much Marc wants to stay and that he's going nowhere. I'm sure the Warrington's, Wigan's and Rhino's of this world will be willing to offer an amount that will change the good Doctors mind.

He will be absolutely fuming like any boss would if a prize asset wanted to jump ship just when things started looking like they were falling into place.

You can understand that now Marc has shown he has the ability to perform and mix it at the top level that he wants away. Why should he show loyalty to a team that we willing to loan him out to what was thought to be a relegation dog fight. I'm sure Marwan will learn from these mistakes and will think twice when sanctioning such a loan in future.

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:32 pm  

Michigan red wrote:

Would prefer him too go anywhere but Castleford, I personally think he will go to a big club and have a genuine crack at becoming the future England/GB scrum half.

Bit underhand if he has been promising one thing to the club then throwing this in.

Rather than any transfer fee I'd be much happier to see some good young British talent come to the club from say a Wigan, Leeds or Saints.

Well take him at saints who'd you want?

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:37 pm  

Dual reg at Barrow next season

I can only see the Doc digging his heals in over this if he feels he's been lied too. He is under no obligation to sell unless a fee he feels is worth comes in,

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:40 pm  

If Sneyd has an agenda it should be with Noble it was him that didn`t fancy him , the club has moved on , hopefully still with marc , Walsh going back to oz has emerged again so if saints come in for him , i wouldn`t mind a straight swap for walmsley .

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:41 pm  

tigerman1231 wrote:

shows you lot that he doesn't want to be part of the circus
well done marc hope you sign for us!!!

Charlie knew as I reported this a couple of weeks ago , when I offered Marc a post at the Tower Circus , he declined .

Re: Sneyd asks for a move : Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:46 pm  

the red fusilier wrote:

If Sneyd has an agenda it should be with Noble it was him that didn`t fancy him , the club has moved on , hopefully still with marc , Walsh going back to oz has emerged again so if saints come in for him , i wouldn`t mind a straight swap for walmsley .

A) Walsh (at this moment in time) isn't going home next year. It's a recurring rumour similar to what we had with Jamie Lyon.

B) walmsley signed a 5 year deal at the start of the season, Sneyd has 1 year left on his contract. I've seen a few times Salford fans suggest with cas fans you do a swap for Clark, also on a 5 year contract. Sneyd has a significantly lower value than either because of this,