Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:17 am  

I've been told tonight he'll be a Hull KR player next season. Dont shoot the messenger.

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:23 am  

MarioRugby wrote:

Dont shoot the messenger.

Would that we could Neil, would that we could.

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:49 am  

Stab him,
Poison him,
Drop a comedy anvil on his head,
Hang, draw and quarter,
Exsanguinate him.

The perfect half time entertainment if you ask me.

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:53 am  

WHO LET HIM IN AGAIN ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:01 pm  

Just like Carney is on his way to Leigh?

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:40 pm  

I`d heard Neil Barker off to Job Centre.

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:57 pm  

Thanks for the info Mario. Why are people so mean, naming people is against the AUP by the way.
As for Adam Walne. I'm afraid he won't be a miss yes he may of improved this year as he had too, hardly set the world alight but if Sheens decides to let him go he obviously has his reasons.

Re: Adam Walne : Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:34 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Thanks for the info Mario. Why are people so mean, naming people is against the AUP by the way.
As for Adam Walne. I'm afraid he won't be a miss yes he may of improved this year as he had too, hardly set the world alight but if Sheens decides to let him go he obviously has his reasons.

People are fed-up with him deliberately posting negative dribble just for the sake of doing it. It wouldn't bother me if he was predominantly correct with his stories, but they're nearly always mischief making nonsense. Also, the fact that he is a former journo now working for another RL Club means that not only is he an idiot, he's also showing a lack of professionalism and shows his current employer up.

As for the current 'story', I really couldn't care less either way.