No operation required for White : Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:17 pm  

Fishal site confirms that Paul White will NOT need an op, as first feared; http://reds.originalreddevils.com/2009/ ... for-white/ Good news for the lad, and hope to see him back up and running (literally?!) very soon. However, on Saturday's showing, will he get a spot in the team ahead of Wilshere or Henry? Nice to have a selection to make though, and a bit of strength in depth, especially in the backs.

Fishal site confirms that Paul White will NOT need an op, as first feared; http://reds.originalreddevils.com/2009/ ... for-white/ Good news for the lad, and hope to see him back up and running (literally?!) very soon. However, on Saturday's showing, will he get a spot in the team ahead of Wilshere or Henry? Nice to have a selection to make though, and a bit of strength in depth, especially in the backs.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:02 am  

Even on saturdays result I dont think you can ignore whites nack for scoring trys, in open space hes always gonna be leathel (whether he gets as much in SL thats another question).

Id drop littler, put henry in the centre and white on Talau's wing, but then again thats why Im not a SL coach!

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:55 am  

Littler has played well enough not to be dropped.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:55 am  

OOPs , forgot, praising Littler is NOT allowed on this forum.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:05 pm  

lol...what he tackled well in the first game of the season against CC

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:05 pm  

DirkDiggler wrote:

lol...what he tackled well in the first game of the season against CC

Which means he's played well in every game of the season

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:14 am  

ok take the point littler for GB