: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:47 pm
trys'r'us wrote:
A replacement is sorely needed, although I'm struggling to think of a London-based 'expert' with a high enough profile.
Do they really need to have high profile though? We will all watch regardless just for the trys. If anything it is worrying about the profile which is the problem, they should be looking for someone with talent rather than a name.
They must surely have a junior reporter who follows the sport and would be up to the task. Even Bobbins could have done a better job on his own.
GIANT DAZ wrote:
big graeme ?
He is Scottish now, no one will be able to understand him south of the wall.
The Kings of Hull wrote:
Can't understand why both them and the BBC persist in employing Union based people to review our game.
If they can talk coherently their basis could be a pinball wizard for all I care.
Tony Catsmith wrote:
holy poop, i didn't watch it tonight, but it must've been loving awful if it's brought mav out of exile.
It was awful. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, a few weeks to lose the rust, but he is getting worse rather than better. If this keeps up I will eventually have to actually complain directly to Sky instead of just whinging on the internet.
(Thanks, your username seems to have evolved rather nicely.)
chubbs1981 wrote:
Dear sky tv i'm skint i'll do his spot for £50 + travel expences, and a pie!
If they pay travel and cost then I am sure everyone watching will be happy to keep you set for pies.
BA Baracus for semaphore.
Michael.
)
I thought exactly the same. And I totally agree with him.
