Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:59 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

More obstruction than the Cas disallowed try last week and less downward pressure than Ryan Shaw for Hull KR, also disallowed.

But hey it's Leeds so got to give it!

Shaw was carrying the ball and lost it, Leeds was a grubber that Keinhorst got a finger too.

HTH.

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Shaw was carrying the ball and lost it, Leeds was a grubber that Keinhorst got a finger too.

HTH.

Shaw didn't lose the ball but, don't let the facts cloud your judgement.

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:29 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

More obstruction than the Cas disallowed try last week and less downward pressure than Ryan Shaw for Hull KR, also disallowed.

But hey it's Leeds so got to give it!

I didn't see any obstruction but agree with the grounding, ridiculous.

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:50 pm  

Willzay wrote:

I didn't see any obstruction but agree with the grounding, ridiculous.

His hand hit the ball while it was on the ground. What more do you want? I dislike Leeds as much as the next man but, that was a try.

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:58 pm  

roversmad wrote:

Shaw didn't lose the ball but, don't let the facts cloud your judgement.

Sorry worded it wrong.

Personally don't think he lost it but that's how it was 'judged' but it's a different and incomparable incident to the Keinhorst one tonight.

A guy carrying the ball having to been judged (rightly or wrongly) to have lost contact is a different scenario to a player putting a hand or finger on a loose ball and thus shouldn't be compared on here by people wanting to rant.

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:01 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Sorry worded it wrong.

Personally don't think he lost it but that's how it was 'judged' but it's a different and incomparable incident to the Keinhorst one tonight.

A guy carrying the ball having to been judged (rightly or wrongly) to have lost contact is a different scenario to a player putting a hand or finger on a loose ball and thus shouldn't be compared on here by people wanting to rant.

So, you thought tonight's was a try?

Re: Refs : Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:25 pm  

Keinhorst's finger was bent at 90 degrees as it hit the floor. Indisputably a try.

Re: Refs : Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:35 am  

tigertot wrote:

Keinhorst's finger was bent at 90 degrees as it hit the floor. Indisputably a try.

Of course. I am amazed how anyone can say it was not a try!

Re: Refs : Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:29 am  

roversmad wrote:

Of course. I am amazed how anyone can say it was not a try!

Yep. The only issue on that try was the possibility of obstruction. The grounding was clear.

Re: Refs : Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:34 am  

Willzay wrote:

Think the standard has just reached a new low (if that were ever possible). Then I remembered Gansons in charge!

The RFL always want more match officals. If you think you can do a better job than those doing the job at the moment do a course.