The Devil's Advocate wrote:
Whilst the noises coming from the club via Beaumont, Murphy et al do come across as a major dummy spit, I can sympathise with their situation.
Why should the Championship clubs be hamstrung by an unfair system, it’s not as if they’re clamouring for a greater slice of the Sky money.
Sure there will be blow-out scores during the regular season (no change there then) but when it comes down to the nitty-gritty in the middle eights the disparity in the two leagues is clear to see.
If for instance, the top four S.L clubs were allowed a greater S.C. than the other eight teams there would be hell on, it’s all about aspirations & the current system is hampering some clubs in this respect.
I don't sympathise with them at all. The salary caps are in place to prevent clubs being ruined by their owners. You had that great bastion of RL, Wigan, sold to Dave Whelan for a fiver and it's historic ground made into a Tesco car park because there was no salary cap. Without one, the likes of Salford, Leigh, Wigan and Warrington would spend at irresponsible levels and before you know it their owner would suffer financial problems or be arrested or lose interest and all of a sudden RLFC Salford of Swinton and Wigan 2017 RLFC would appear in the top tier of the conference, robbing their fans of their club.
Koukash has no excuses for Salford being unable to compete, it's his own fault. Wigan keep bleating about it because their history is built solely on spending more money than anyone else and not through being better. Leigh moaning is a joke, all they had to do was beat the teams from the Championship to set up a one off game to get into SL and they couldn't even manage that. So why should they be allowed to spend hundreds of thousands more than anyone, just so they can do well? This is the same Leigh that a couple of years ago was going through awful times financially.
The other reason for a cap is a level playing field. What fun is a league where success is based not on youth development, squad development, commitment and talent, but instead on how much more than anyone else the owner was willing to lose on the undertaking.