: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:45 pm  

Cant we just have a sticky thread for Dally to post his wild claims in and when challenged to back it up resorts to insults or goes hiding. It happens in every thread so I think he deserves one for himself.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:58 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

Cant we just have a sticky thread for Dally to post his wild claims in and when challenged to back it up resorts to insults or goes hiding. It happens in every thread so I think he deserves one for himself.

That would be entertaining. We could make a list of them for a laugh as well...

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:11 am  

Eurob0y wrote:

Cant we just have a sticky thread for Dally to post his wild claims in and when challenged to back it up resorts to insults or goes hiding. It happens in every thread so I think he deserves one for himself.

just sit back and pay attention to my posts and you will learn a hell of a lot about RL.

when youve read as much about the game as i have then its a natural consequence of it.

still you have to sort through loads of irrelevant information, stuff like your posts for example.

if i want to know about union id go on scum.com

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:13 am  

Wellsy13 wrote:

That would be entertaining. We could make a list of them for a laugh as well...

Wellsy13 wrote:

Have you got a figure for that? Or at least an article anywhere that mentions it? That would be really useful to my study.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:43 am  

Dally, you didn't provide a figure, you just listed the number of eligible NZ players from a fan blog in the NRL first team squads, which I appreciate but doesn't quite back up you claim that the figure is "through the roof".

dally messenger wrote:

the number of NZ eligible players in australia with NRL clubs, under 20s is through the roof.

the game in new zealand isnt much of a deal.

the Warriors have an Under 20s team, there is an Auckland team in the Premier League.

there are loads more actual NZ NRL players now than in the 90s so the figures are clearly misleading.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:56 am  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Dally, you didn't provide a figure, you just listed the number of eligible NZ players from a fan blog in the NRL first team squads, which I appreciate but doesn't quite back up you claim that the figure is "through the roof".

i didnt know my opinions mattered so much to you

if i thought they had id have put more effort into it.

dont worry, ill help you pass your course.

here to help

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:31 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

i didnt know my opinions mattered so much to you

if i thought they had id have put more effort into it.

dont worry, ill help you pass your course.

here to help

Dally, if you had a point you could back up, it would help and your opinion would matter. Unfortunately, you didn't back it up, so it doesn't matter, and so you didn't help.
I would appreciate your help if you were helpful, and your opinions would matter to me if they were justified. As this is not the case, then you are about as useful as an underwater hair-drier.

Get back to TRL where you are trying to argue that it's OK to be racist as long as they committed an offence first. I'm looking forward to watching you squirm your way out of that one, lad!

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:46 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Dally, if you had a point you could back up, it would help and your opinion would matter. Unfortunately, you didn't back it up, so it doesn't matter, and so you didn't help.
I would appreciate your help if you were helpful, and your opinions would matter to me if they were justified. As this is not the case, then you are about as useful as an underwater hair-drier.

Get back to TRL where you are trying to argue that it's OK to be racist as long as they committed an offence first. I'm looking forward to watching you squirm your way out of that one, lad!

wellsey next time you want some help with your course just PM.

im not sure everyone else wants to read about your poor researching skills.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:55 pm  

SO in true Wally fashion he has no evidence to back up his claims.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:06 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

wellsey next time you want some help with your course just PM.

im not sure everyone else wants to read about your poor researching skills.

You do realise that a part of research is using other people's research and critiquing it, don't you?

And that not all participation figures are open to the public domain?

Thought not. So far you have proven you don't understand broadcasting AND researching on this thread. Anything else you want to prove you're crap at?