: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:28 am  

Dave K. wrote:

I more impressed with our all English backline (including Halfbacks), of which 5 have come through our youth system.

Raynor, Calderwood & Thorman never.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:35 am  

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:

I saw Hull at Bridgend and thought their pack went well.

Dowes had one of the best games ive seen him have.
Berrigan got Hull back in the game.
Cusack was much improved on last year.
Radford went well
Tickle was outstanding
Washbrook was awful though and 18 Celtic points came through his shoddy defence.
On current form Murrell is ahead of Washbrook.

The signings give them a bit of depth and more so IF Crocker eventually gets the green light.
The Bradford fan was right though, their pack is probably the best in SL but their backs are dire

Which is exactly the reason Agar dropped him for the next game

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:37 am  

Stanley Unwin wrote:

Which is exactly the reason Agar dropped him for the next game

Yeah that and the hamstring injury that hampered him for that game, so was rested!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:55 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Raynor, Calderwood & Thorman never.

Didn't know Raynor played on friday, must have missed him.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:59 am  

Dave K. wrote:

Didn't know Raynor played on friday, must have missed him.

Thought you was on about with everyone fit.

Serves me right for jumping in!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:16 am  

Dowes V Graham No competition
Berrigan V Cunningham No competition
Cusack V Hargreaves Pretty even
Tickle V Puletua No competition
Radders V Flannery Even
Washbrook V Wilkin Just.[b]

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:23 am  

Ashy wrote:

Dowes V Graham No competition
Berrigan V Cunningham No competition
Cusack V Hargreaves Pretty even
Tickle V Puletua No competition
Radders V Flannery Even
Washbrook V Wilkin Just.[b]

Cunningham and Hargreaves

Flannery over Radford everytime for me aswell.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:31 am  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

Cunningham and Hargreaves

Flannery over Radford everytime for me aswell.

Pmsl some people don't have a clue... Cunningham hasn't got shit Berrigan now.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:44 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Pmsl some people don't have a clue... Cunningham hasn't got shit Berrigan now.

I think its you who doesn't have a clue. Cunningham is still by far and away the besy hooker in SL. Its not even close. No one else can make a team tick the way Cunningham does. Its an ability that only the likes of Johns, Lewis and Hanley have.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:52 am  

Ashy wrote:

I think its you who doesn't have a clue. Cunningham is still by far and away the besy hooker in SL. Its not even close. No one else can make a team tick the way Cunningham does.

Cunningham isn't even in the top 2 hookers in the league.

As for Hargreaves better than Cusack? I guess you don't realise what he offers to Hull and you obviously don't rate him because he doesn't bust through defences every hit up. I really like Hargreaves but he isn't as good Cusack.