: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:22 pm  

St.John wrote:

No, it doesn't.

This is you making things up again, and hoping people won't notice. It's a strange tactic, particularly as people can simply read the thread.

here mate, your own quote.

you accused me of making it up when clearly from the thread there are examples of what ive said.

dont worry, i dont get offended when people say im a liar.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:24 pm  

regardless of who i support I love to gloat when I see arrogance fall flat out in its ar5e! Aside from the fact I thought what Stuart did was disgraceful for a national coach (of any side) and he had to go, the fact he was the Australian coach and the fact Australians had been so arrogant leading up to the tournament just made me laugh, alot!

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:31 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

ive provided examples of gloating which you said didnt happen.

That's not what I said.

me wrote:

England fans, astonishing as this may seem to you, actually care about the image of the game as well as winning.

We don't have the luxury of the extensive coverage you enjoy in Aus, so we're very protective of our hard-earned image for being friendly and amiable, with no quarter asked nor given on the field but an extensive and good natured cameraderie off it.

You shouldn't assume it's simple schadenfreude from the England fans - many of us genuinely were disgusted by Stuart's behaviour towards the officials in public.

I have not said there is no gloating - I've said the objection to Stuart's behaviour is not simply due to him being the then Australian coach.

Like I said earlier, you make things up.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:35 pm  

St.John wrote:

That's not what I said.



I have not said there is no gloating - I've said the objection to Stuart's behaviour is not simply due to him being the then Australian coach.

Like I said earlier, you make things up.

how can i have made it up when the post above yours specifically is from someone who says he is gloating.

you really should apologize for saying i made it up, but i doubt you will

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:38 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

how can i have made it up when the post above yours specifically is from someone who says he is gloating.

Because I didn't claim there was no gloating. That was something you made up.

I've posted my quote, and it makes no reference to an absence of gloating - it points out that the objection to Stuarts behaviour is not motivated purely by who he coaches. There is an objection to that sort of behaviour from a coach full stop.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:52 pm  

St.John wrote:

Because I didn't claim there was no gloating. That was something you made up.

I've posted my quote, and it makes no reference to an absence of gloating - it points out that the objection to Stuarts behaviour is not motivated purely by who he coaches. There is an objection to that sort of behaviour from a coach full stop.

sorry but thats a load of BS.

if you dont want to admit you are wrong thats fine enough with me.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:55 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

sorry but thats a load of BS.

It's not - and anyone who cares to read my comments will see that it's something you've simply made up.

Please quote exactly where I said there was no gloating.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:57 pm  

St.John wrote:

It's not - and anyone who cares to read my comments will see that it's something you've simply made up.

Please quote exactly where I said there was no gloating.

dally messenger wrote: and judging from the gloating on here, i think my point stands.


you - No, it doesn't.

This is you making things up again, and hoping people won't notice. It's a strange tactic, particularly as people can simply read the thread.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:00 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

[b]dally messenger wrote: and judging from the gloating on here, i think my point stands.

Your point being:

you wrote:

like i said before, this whole stuart bashing here is just a case of sour grapes by english fans at how bad their team were.

its really, really bad form

Your point does not stand unless the Stuart bashing is motivated solely by who he coaches, and who the poster supports. That's not the case.

Now, please quote where I said there was no gloating.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:03 pm  

St.John wrote:

Your point being:



Your point does not stand unless the Stuart bashing is motivated solely by who he coaches, and who the poster supports. That's not the case.

Now, please quote where I said there was no gloating.

your reacting to one post, me the other one.

but hey you stick to the liar claim, its making you look good.