Re: 2011 SL Transfers : Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:11 am
BrisbaneRhino wrote:
Smokey, you quote the following:
The next generation of Ablett, Smith, Scruton, Murrell, came through 4-6 years ago.
None of these are world beaters. Scruton debuted in 2002 anyway (albeit at 17), and Murrell's not worth much.
The next generation of Ablett, Smith, Scruton, Murrell, came through 4-6 years ago.
None of these are world beaters. Scruton debuted in 2002 anyway (albeit at 17), and Murrell's not worth much.
one of them Smith is an international, ive no doubt before long 2 others (Scruton and Ablett) will be internationals before long, 3 international players isnt a bad return per generation
then 2-4 years ago we had Hall, Golden, Fox and Burgess, Ratu, Gibson, Broughton and Allen,
Of these Hall is good, Fox is one that got away but the rest are nothing to write home about. Golden, Fox and Broughton never troubled the Leeds first team even when injuries allowed, and Ratu played a handful of games.
Of these Hall is good, Fox is one that got away but the rest are nothing to write home about. Golden, Fox and Broughton never troubled the Leeds first team even when injuries allowed, and Ratu played a handful of games.
I'm not talking about 17 new players a year, that's cr*p. I'm saying that since Burrow and McGuire started in 2001 for example, Leeds haven't produced a single halfback who has looked like even pressuring them for a spot in the side. The careers of the wannabees who have left the club in that time bears this out.
A club our size IMO ought to be producing a halfback every two-three years who is SL quality, and a real goodun every five years or so. If you think that's not possible have a look at the NRL - most clubs have that sort of standard of youngsters coming through.
and most NRL clubs dont have that standard coming through, Wests for example havent brought through another Benji, St George couldnt find another Gasnier. Darren Lockyer has been first choice for Brisbane and Australia since Methuselah was a youngster.
No club, in RL is bringing through a half back as good as Danny Mcguire every 5 years.
We have a pathway where we have a stable squad, added to by the young players good enough to do so, and a succession plan so that when these players come towards the end of their career we have a prospect in place to take over. What we dont do is drop danny Mcguire at his peak to give game-time to a player who isnt as good as him and doesnt have his potential.
Thats why as Sinfield hits thirty we see Clarkson come in, as Diskin creaps towards 30, McShane gets game-time. Mcguire is 27, over the next three or so years we will see Stevie Ward get game time, and its why we didnt three years ago drop Danny Mcguire for Jordan Tansey.
Sheer number of players means nothing - where's the real quality in the lists above? Not one world class player. Again, not having a dig at Leeds alone, but its not as great a record as many make out (especially Leeds fans).
the numbers speak for themselves. We will succeed and fail because of our youth development, its something we can rightly be proud of