Conroy wrote:
You've had chance after chance to get bigger crowds and have failed. Somebody else should get a turn now.
What do you base this sweeping judgement on?
London's average of 2,808 last year was the lowest ever in the history of the club in SL and it is very worrying that year on year they have dropped a total of 43% since we rerturned to the stoop in 2006. This average gives the club an (approximate) income of a million quid in ticket and residual revenues. Then they receive 1.3 million from SKY and the owner throws in another 1.5 million, so they turn over 3.8 million a year and owe nobody other than the owner any money. No overdraft, no bank loans, no anything...they are 100% debt free. Londons crowds are a concern.....but only for London themselves and the RFL......as I have said, our home attendances do not cost any of the other clubs a brass farthing and if we're honest, are none of your loving business.
Since 2006, great strides have been made with the development of the game in London by the club, bankrolled not by the RFL, but by the club. Our community officers...sorry, award winning community officers have visited schools across the south east and promoted the game. Participation numbers are continuing to grow......in case you missed it, Howard of Effingham School from Surrey are the National Schools Champions having defeated Castleford Academy at Wembley, the London Skolars have started to become more competative now they are picking up some of the Harlequins RL/London Broncos academy players, London trained players are starting to be picked up across ESL ....and the club have never finished in a relegation position.
Your opinion that "someone else" should be given a chance carries little if any factual weight....it is little more than a flatcappers opinion. Your whippet needs feeding.