Re: Chase - how long ban? : Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:59 am
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Not at all. Judicial bodies do exactly this all day long. The disciplinary is just one more form of judicial body and all they do (and all they can do) is arrive at a decision based on the relevant standard of proof
It would be nonsensical if it was anything else. On the basis of the 'impossible' argument, no person, ever, anywhere, could ever be convicted of doing anything deliberately, if they came up with an excuse, since only they can actually know what was in their head. That would be absurd.
It would be nonsensical if it was anything else. On the basis of the 'impossible' argument, no person, ever, anywhere, could ever be convicted of doing anything deliberately, if they came up with an excuse, since only they can actually know what was in their head. That would be absurd.
So, you’re presumably saying the Disciplinary Panel decided that the Chase challenge was just reckless?
If that’s the case we need some new blood (no pun intended) on the Panel.