: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:27 am  

dally messenger wrote:

and the guy that will replace finch is the son of steve mortimer. a player that rivalled the great peter sterling in the 80s as the 2 great clubs of the 80s were winning competition (dogs)

Daniel Mortimer is not the son of Steve Mortimer.

He is the son of Peter Mortimer, Steve's brother.

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:36 am  

hindyscrack wrote:

Daniel Mortimer is not the son of Steve Mortimer.

He is the son of Peter Mortimer, Steve's brother.

Are you trying to imply that you know more about the history of the NRL than DillyDally?

In his short life DillyDally has redrawn the map of France, relocating an entire city (Lyon) to the south of France. He did this from his home in Australia.

If it wasn't for DillyDally, we would never know what was happening in the NRL.

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:38 am  

Alice's Phallus wrote:

Are you trying to imply that you know more about the history of the NRL than DillyDally?

In his short life DillyDally has redrawn the map of France, relocating an entire city (Lyon) to the south of France. He did this from his home in Australia.

If it wasn't for DillyDally, we would never know what was happening in the NRL.

why do you change the font of your posts.

i mean its not as if you are short of being attention seeking

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:39 am  

hindyscrack wrote:

Daniel Mortimer is not the son of Steve Mortimer.

He is the son of Peter Mortimer, Steve's brother.

fair enough

you said you were happy finch has gone, so weve both made silly comments

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:43 am  

dally messenger wrote:

fair enough

you said you were happy finch has gone, so weve both made silly comments

No I gave an opinion of most eels fans...

You gave an incorrect fact.

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:07 am  

1. I'd be VERY surprised if Finch is on 400k.

2. He is definitely part of the reason the Eels are under-performing. If the Eels lost against the Raiders, he would've been the worst offender. Still was, even though they won. He was nearly as bad again, against the Roosters.

3. While i've heard Cayless could be next, I haven't heard the same about Hindmarsh. One article is all i've read, so would be happy to be pointed in the right direction, but the two other names mentioned were Cayless and Cordoba.

4. Parra would be absolutely mad to give Hindmarsh the flick. He's playing very well, I want him for NSW.

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:14 am  

CGD

Fox or Dally have their wires crossed and lumped Hindmarsh in with Cayless. Hindmarsh has not been put on notice, neither does his form warrant it.

Cayless has need a kick up the ass for a couple of years, this dose of reality could do him the world of good.

Back on topic, I can still see Finch coming to SL. He might not want to, but he requested the release and the ball is in Parramattas court at the moment. They (although having a stupidly high contract to sort out) have the slight upper hand in negotiations.

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:54 am  

sharks need him

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:10 pm  

fredie wrote:

sharks need him

: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:29 pm  

hindyscrack wrote:

No I gave an opinion of most eels fans...

You gave an incorrect fact.

you gave an opinion on you.

then again it was funny listening to laurie daley, gary belcher and gary freeman all talking about what a good player he was and why the club were pushing him out.

i remembered your comments and had a giggle.