: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:24 am  

Birstalltiger wrote:

I played against the Agar and i have got the better then him he was an bottom licker only and got any where in the because of is Dad.Has for the Quins coach he was more known for is fist not is rugby.

Ha so you are bitter they both made a career out of the game and you failed then.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:30 am  

Big Graeme wrote:

:lol:

Anyway, I thought it was a decent game, bit of a forwards arm wrestle but a decent game, not every game needs to be a tryathon with poor defenses on show.

It was utter turd. There was little attacking endeavour from either side and Quins got home by being the better of two very poor teams on the night.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:46 am  

Those who didn't enjoy the game are definitely watchng the wrong sport.

Moronball or cricket for you.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:43 am  

Great result for Quinns well done!

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:44 am  

Rock God X wrote:

It was utter turd. There was little attacking endeavour from either side and Quins got home by being the better of two very poor teams on the night.

Tosh!!

Quins played with a very simple game plan. Hull weren't good enough or inventive enough to counter it. Job done. Well done Quins!

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:54 am  

Kevs Head wrote:

Tosh!!

Quins played with a very simple game plan. Hull weren't good enough or inventive enough to counter it. Job done. Well done Quins!

Agreed, Quins did a solid job on them and worked hard to make up for last weeks poor showing, i enjoyed the game.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:24 am  

Leaguefan wrote:

Those who didn't enjoy the game are definitely watchng the wrong sport.

Precisely. Having actually been at The Stoop and paid full attention to the whole eighty minutes I found it a compelling game to watch. In the previous two weeks I've seen my team rack up the biggest score of the current season against a dire Warrington, and I've seen us soundly beaten by a very good Huddersfield. This was a better match to watch than either of those with far fewer unforced errors and better defending all round. Some people seem to think the score count has to reach basketball proportions for a game to be good entertainment.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:21 pm  

Kevs Head wrote:

Tosh!!

Quins played with a very simple game plan. Hull weren't good enough or inventive enough to counter it. Job done. Well done Quins!

I've already agreed that Hull weren't good enough to win when I said Quins were the better side. The fact remains, both sides played boring rugby and I'd have much rather have seen a little attacking flair from either side than the five drives and a kick that was on offer.

The fact that Quins' five drives and a kick were better than Hull's doesn't make it any more entertaining.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:05 pm  

Clubb ran in his try on the 6th tackle. Purdham kicked from the base of the scrum when Dorn missed the bounce under the posts. More to our game than five drives and a kick.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:07 pm  

Mr Sheen wrote:

Clubb ran in his try on the 6th tackle. Purdham kicked from the base of the scrum when Dorn missed the bounce under the posts. More to our game than five drives and a kick.

Only because it wasn't worth kicking to the sidelines or kicking dead.