: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:21 pm  

number 6 wrote:

:lol: of any injuries you have, only vella is your biggest loss

Well it's not as if we could have more than 1 biggest loss and he is arguably our best player.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:29 pm  

I'm leaving out Crocker as IMO it's not happening:



Dowes V Fozzard
Berrigan V Fisher
Cusack V Vella
Tickle V Newton Tough one to call IMO
Radders V Galea offers much more with ball in hand
Washbrook V Murrell too close to call i'd say.


are you mad murrell much better and newton much better agree with rest but as i say sts/leeds/bulls pack are much better with a few exceptions

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:15 pm  

Bighead wrote:

me neither. every player in there is completely average, including the massively overhyped berrigan

you are a complete and utter fool, what you know about RL you could write on the back of a stamp!
Berrigan overhyped????? what fcuking planet are you on?? even the most blinkered HKR fan, would tell you the man oozes class, why dont you support some other sport, because obviously RL and Bighead, just dont mix

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:19 pm  

Paul124897 wrote:

Dowes vs Burgess
Berrigan vs Newton
Cusack vs Scruton
Tickle vs Menzies
Crocker vs Morrison - Unable to call
Radders vs Langley

Shows how weak the Hull pack is.

The Bradford pack has dominated both Hull KR and Huddersfield in consecutive weeks, but Bradford don't have the backs to follow through. Play those two packs against each other and Bradford would win in the go forward everytime - and 2 of those are 35 and 32 respectively.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:29 pm  

hullkrforever wrote:

I'm leaving out Crocker as IMO it's not happening:



Dowes V Fozzard
Berrigan V Fisher
Cusack V Vella
Tickle V Newton Tough one to call IMO
Radders V Galea offers much more with ball in hand
Washbrook V Murrell too close to call i'd say.

are you mad murrell much better and newton much better agree with rest but as i say sts/leeds/bulls pack are much better with a few exceptions

Is that why Morgan is a huge fan of Washy and even tried to sign him?

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:31 pm  

MODS may aswell lock this...Just another Hull vs KR thread!

[Kosh]

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:08 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

MODS may aswell lock this...Just another Hull vs KR thread!

Like it was ever going to be anything else.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:44 pm  

I saw Hull at Bridgend and thought their pack went well.

Dowes had one of the best games ive seen him have.
Berrigan got Hull back in the game.
Cusack was much improved on last year.
Radford went well
Tickle was outstanding
Washbrook was awful though and 18 Celtic points came through his shoddy defence.
On current form Murrell is ahead of Washbrook.

The signings give them a bit of depth and more so IF Crocker eventually gets the green light.
The Bradford fan was right though, their pack is probably the best in SL but their backs are dire

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:52 pm  

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:

I saw Hull at Bridgend and thought their pack went well.

Dowes had one of the best games ive seen him have.
Berrigan got Hull back in the game.
Cusack was much improved on last year.
Radford went well
Tickle was outstanding
Washbrook was awful though and 18 Celtic points came through his shoddy defence.
On current form Murrell is ahead of Washbrook.

The signings give them a bit of depth and more so IF Crocker eventually gets the green light.
The Bradford fan was right though, their pack is probably the best in SL but their backs are dire

tbf, washy was carrying a hamstring injury through the game, hence him being missing from the catalan game, on full fitness, washy over murrell anyday imo

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:57 pm  

number 6 wrote:

tbf, washy was carrying a hamstring injury through the game, hence him being missing from the catalan game, on full fitness, washy over murrell anyday imo

Imo Washy shouldn't of played in the first two games at all. I don't think he needed to. They should of let him rest his injury. I like Murrell the chav but he isn't as good as Washbrook.