Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:04 pm  

BuckleyStreetWire wrote:

I've seen far FAR better games that ended 6-4 than last night's game. I've seen better ball handling in far worse conditions. I've seen better defence (winning try efforts from Cark and Westerman) at a school game.

Couldnt agree more BSW.

We actually handled worse conditions better in the second half against Salford at their place when Sandow dropped 'that' goal, the rain was torrential at one point. We also built pressure really well in that second half after a truely abysmal first half....which is the annoying thing for me. Why could we not do that against Hull, quit the stupid offloads, respect the ball, earn field position and the chances will come.

Woeful!!

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:28 pm  

WWRLFC78 wrote:

I agree, but lets not forget that Warrington had two clear cut chances bombed by Westerman and Clark. If only one of those had come off the result could have been a lot different!

What if Jamie shaul didn't lose the ball over our try line or lose the ball when frank off loaded it

What if marc snyed didn't delay his kick


We can all think of excuses

[Uncle Rico]

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:33 pm  

number 6 wrote:

What if Jamie shaul didn't lose the ball over our try line or lose the ball when frank off loaded it

What if marc snyed didn't delay his kick


We can all think of excuses

I think that was the point if you read the previous post from Diablo

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:38 pm  

number 6 wrote:

What if Jamie shaul didn't lose the ball over our try line or lose the ball when frank off loaded it

What if marc snyed didn't delay his kick


We can all think of excuses

Wasn't thinking of excuses.... was merely pointing out to Diablo1967 that Warrington also had chances to score more points than we did and that it isn't all about the conditions stopping Hull from scoring more points...like he suggested.

The fact is the game was awful, both sides had easy chances to score more points than they did. Had Hull took their missed chances then the score would have been more conclusive, had Warrington capitalised on even just one of those missed chances then the outcome may have been different.

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:49 pm  

WWRLFC78 wrote:

Wasn't thinking of excuses.... was merely pointing out to Diablo1967 that Warrington also had chances to score more points than we did and that it isn't all about the conditions stopping Hull from scoring more points...like he suggested.

The fact is the game was awful, both sides had easy chances to score more points than they did. Had Hull took their missed chances then the score would have been more conclusive, had Warrington capitalised on even just one of those missed chances then the outcome may have been different.

we gave you two tries, if we had been smarter you would most probably have been nilled

like i said, what if? all ifs and buts


awful game, but two points in the bag is what was more important

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:56 pm  

number 6 wrote:

we gave you two tries, if we had been smarter you would most probably have been nilled

like i said, what if? all ifs and buts


awful game, but two points in the bag is what was more important

'IF we had been smarter you would most probably have been nilled?'

Your just not getting it at all are you???

Feel like I'm banging my head against a brick wall here.

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:18 pm  

WWRLFC78 wrote:

'IF we had been smarter you would most probably have been nilled?'

Your just not getting it at all are you???

Feel like I'm banging my head against a brick wall here.

That's the sort of crap we have to deal with on the Rovers forum when they wander over to gloat and patronise.

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:31 pm  

LifeLongHKRFan wrote:

That's the sort of crap we have to deal with on the Rovers forum when they wander over to gloat and patronise.

I'm glad someone understands what I'm trying to say!!

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:09 pm  

WWRLFC78 wrote:

I'm glad someone understands what I'm trying to say!!

Are you trying to say that if things had been different they would have been different?

[Uncle Rico]

Re: Wire v Hull : Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:41 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Are you trying to say that if things had been different they would have been different?

I doubt they'd be different as far as Number 6 is concerned as it would involve reading AND writing