Jeff the God of Biscuits wrote:
I cannot believe after 25 pages, with evidence to disprove your point of view
By evidence you mean people bleating on about nothing in particular? When there's both video and pictures showing first contact was a head collision and 2nd contact was with his upper arm?
The people saying "why did he taunt him then"...why did Jonathan Walker taunt Luke Burgess when he split his jaw in 2? Answer: at the time you don't realise what's happened.
The people saying sue him/charge him: You would need to prove beyond doubt that it was indeed intentional, every single lawyer I know would get it thrown out within an hour, especially with the pool of "witnesses" being amateur psychologists with a grudge against Chase. In fact, every single person in this thread who are calling for all this could in fact be sued themselves for libel because it would be far easier for Chase to prove that it was accidental than it would be for other people to prove it was deliberate.
In fact, thanks to this thread, if CTRLFC/Rangi Chase saw it, this website could be in a lot of trouble.
Very poorly timed challenge and it is unfortunate what has occurred as a result. No evidence to suggest it was an "attack" and it is clear that there was no leading with either elbow or forearm and it was below the shoulder that connects with Ropati's jaw. All the nonsense about the "mean look" that he gives him after is exactly that, I don't think I've seen any other expression on Rangi's face.
You're wrong! Everyone on here saw Chase plan it and at was a malicious attack and he actually intended to retire Ropati