Miro wrote:
Back to the game. Why on earth didn't Toronto take three drop goals? 2 points behind all game and the drop goal king O' Brian in the team.
Anyway, congrats London.
Watched the match with my sister who was saying the same thing. Once it got to about 50 minutes and it was apparent that a try was looking hard to come by she said they should be slotting DGs on tackle 4 or 5 each set just to be getting something.
It seems to be the modern approach to go for tries only. Teams that are trailing don't seem to take a shot at goal when given a penalty so often either unless doing so would put them level.
In hindsight taking 3 DGs would have won the game for them but, hypothetically, had they kicked 3 DGs rather than going for tries and had then conceded a penalty and lost 6-5 they would then have been criticised for not going for a try on three occasions that could have won the game. Had they been more accustomed to tough games and grinding out wins then they may have opted for DGs rather than trying daft things like the kick on tackle 2.
London were fully deserving of the win though, fantastic defensive effort from them.