someone been on the cheap french plonk!!?

Fake fan anyhow, should be Batley.

For you finnishing top? for a few years now.

Define few and how this has been a hinrance to being champions.

2008:

17 Harlequins 28 V 24 Leeds

18 Leeds 12 V 26 St. Helens

19 Leeds 18 V 12 Castleford

20 Wigan 23 V 22 Leeds



2007:

18 Leeds 14 V 38 Bradford

19 St. Helens 10 V 22 Leeds

20 Wigan 18 V 2 Leeds

21 Leeds 16 V 23 Wakefield



2006:

21 Castleford 31 V 30 Leeds

22 Leeds 14 V 18 St. Helens

23 Hull FC 23 V 16 Leeds

24 Leeds 18 V 20 Wigan



2005:

25 Leeds 10 V 42 Bradford

26 Wigan 24 V 22 Leeds

27 Wire 33 V 16 Leeds





Top team loses a significant amount of games in a short space of time, looks a bit like bottling it! Appears to be happening earlier and earlier every season!

Last 4 seasons it has hindered you coming top hth.

Stop it you're making an r's of yourself.

I did say you finished strongly. Just can't maintain it throughout the season and have to go the harder route in the play-offs.

Didn't help you in 2006 when you slipped to 3rd and (as usual) lost the first game of the play-offs.

Your inability to read duly noted. Thanks.

Perhaps Leeds should blame injuries.

Your ability to change the point to make it suit yourself is duly noted to, you asked how leeds lacking the consistancy over a season may hinder you, i answered.



Bitterness? for trying to answer your question with facts? deary me someone is touchy

No, what I actually said was (apart from the typo) was...







Oh deary me...

Did you win the league in all 4 seasons he mentioned?



And did it cost you another piece of silverware in the any of these seasons?



You original post said hinderance to the season. If it cost you a piece of silverware, then yes. 2005 and 2008 saw you drop from top spot after holding it for more than half the season. The 2005 slump also included losing in the CCF, so you lost 2 bits of silverware in that slump.



So yes, I'd say it was a hinderance!

Another one with an inability to read...

Did you have a significant number of injuries in your squad to key players during these slumps?



If the answer is no, then you just sound stupid.



And if you are trying to argue that having a significant number of injuries in your squad to key players doesn't hinder results, you just sound more stupid.

Not the original question though was it, you changed it to suit after you didnt like the answer. If you want i can answer them both at the same time.



How has leeds lack of consistancy hindered them- It has stopped them toping the league in the last 4 years.



How has leeds lack of consistancy hindered them from being champions- the last 2 years its hasnt, the two years before it has.



hth.

I do believe this was your original post. Perhaps you should try and remember what you say in future





And did you become champions in the 4 seasons he mentioned?

Thats wasnt the original question though was it? he answered your original question then you changed the question, if your struggling to remember just look back through the thread, i'm sure it will all come flooding back.

Exactly. (well not actually exactly but then I can't be held responsible for your poor english)

With an ability to qoute out of context like that you could have been a tabloid hack





Your ability to change something to suit suggests you could have been an MP to.



The carears officer must have loved you at school

Yes, Now who sounds stupid?

Over the course of the whole thread? still you.



hth.

Shame you didn't have a similar relationship with your English tutor.

As for the original point of this thread I would suggest that we don't know.



Looks like a great season, I genuinely hope that Leeds don't just walk the title again. Would be great to see one of the small clubs like Wakey, Hudders, FC or Cas win it.

Nah we didnt have a relationship, stuff like that was frowned upon in our school. My english tutor was able to teach us that if we asked a question, it could be answered even if some asked another question afterwards, shame you seem to be unable to comprehend that.