Re: Opening SL weekend sees attendances tumbling by 12.66% : Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:28 pm
christopher wrote:
The RFL are looking to change the format to try and increase gates and move the sport forward but I'm sure you'll just be happy to moan anyway.
On the topic of the new changes to the SL format. I have shown countless times and I will repeat it for you, how away fans/who the opposition is makes little if any difference to the running of a SL club. The recent dummy spits from some chairman were, like the RFL themselves, nothing other than hissy fits with little or minor substance.
I will Use HKR as an example, but in reality, could use any heartland club to achieve similar results.
13 Home games in 2013. London were the last team at Craven Park, Catalans the first, so there may well have been additional fans at each game for first/last game scenario. 1,036 for London and 704 for Catalan as against their 2012 totals.
Now, if you take the visits of London and Catalans away from the annual average, then HKR averaged 7,438 (7,495 actual) this year and 7,716 (7,594 actual) in 2012.
57 fewer fans per game than the average for the visit of heartland teams in 2013 is 741 fans all season.
122 fewer fans per game than the average for the visit of heartland teams in 2012 is 1,586 fans all season.
Now, let's say that each fan is worth £40 a pop to the club in ticket sales and residuals....HKR lost £29,640 in potential revenue in 2013 because London and Catalan bring no fans. This figure was $63,440 in 2012.
Hull Kingston Rovers benefactors complained about ploughing £500,000 a year into the club. On a turn over of 4 million, this year, about 3/4 of 1% in turn over was lost because Halifax/Fev/Batley weren't visiting. On the topic of heartland teams, Castleford and Wakefield delivered the 2 lowest gates at CP in 2013. Salford and Huddersfield were next lowest, followed by Widnes, Bradford and St Helens.
Increasing the number of games between "local teams" will not increase the average attendance of SL. Even if it did, it would be an artificial inflation created by further marginalisation of an already localised pastime.
The entire "format change" is being done for the wrong reasons and will deliver little in the way of positive results. The teams that are struggling at the foot of the table were increasingly relying on their own development players to deliver and in cutting their cloth accordingly, but because the RFL got involved in an embarrassing rescue of Bradford and the iconic Oddslum, they are now over a barrel in regards to the wishes of a few clubs. When the 12-12 or 8-8-8 format fails to deliver, what will be the next farcical plan chosen to deliver more fans and interest from sponsors?
We have the best sport.......it's just those entrusted to run it don't have a loving clue how to market it! What makes it worse is that the other lot got more to their season opening double header than the RFL can muster for their Magic Weekend, they fill there own stadium with 82,000 for international friendlies and the command media attention whilst the RFL seem almost apologetic for trying to get attention for itself.
If the RFL were serious about taking the game forward, they would invest heavily in London Broncos in the same way the NRL did with their "expansion" teams outside of NSW. They would issue 5 year licences with achievable targets for each club and there would be consequences for failure, not bail outs and ground purchases for the "favourites" and abandonment for the unfashionable clubs. As it is, they buy into the pipe dreams of Salfords new owner (15,000 fans ), let Bradford continue to stagger along with paper thin assurances and pander to the needs of clubs who in reality, have nobody but themselves to blame for not being self sufficient.
This is not a dig at HKR by the way, but surely it would be easier to attract 2,500 more locals to home games than have the RFL change the entire set up of a competition because they don't know how to market themselves slightly better