Re: The mad doctor : Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:38 am  

Laughed at the widnes fans rendition of "what a waste of money!" Towards him.

Re: The mad doctor : Sat Mar 08, 2014 1:00 pm  

JB Down Under wrote:

Laughed at the widnes fans rendition of "what a waste of money!" Towards him.

Well they know what they are talking about with their club and team.

[Kosh]

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:36 pm  

Back in the news again: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/26533962 Seems like a lovely chap.

Back in the news again: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/26533962 Seems like a lovely chap.

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:40 pm  

were his comments that bad? or is Mr Wood feeling the pressure? http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... rd-rfl-sky

were his comments that bad? or is Mr Wood feeling the pressure? http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... rd-rfl-sky

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:49 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote: were his comments that bad? or is Mr Wood feeling the pressure? http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... rd-rfl-sky I wonder if they've just used the fact that he dropped the f-bomb several times as a reason to penalise.

SmokeyTA wrote: were his comments that bad? or is Mr Wood feeling the pressure? http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... rd-rfl-sky I wonder if they've just used the fact that he dropped the f-bomb several times as a reason to penalise.

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:52 pm  

Iain wrote:

I wonder if they've just used the fact that he dropped the f-bomb several times as a reason to penalise.

Bloody hell, im pretty sure there will be a fair few squeeky bums and lighter wallets if the RFL suddenly starts clamping down on people swearing

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:15 pm  

I didn't realise that club owners could be fined for their opinions about the RFL. I know they can be banned, etc, from owning clubs - the former Barrow owner for example has been so banned - and that's fair enough as owners can ruin clubs. But to fine one for expressing an opinion, regardless how colourful, smacks a bit of someone needing reassurance about the size of their willy?

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 5:05 pm  

Well done RFL trying to silence someone who has raised the sports Media profile more in twelve months than the clowns at Red Hall have done in years.

"Prejudicial to the sport"

Stobarts deal now that was Prejudicial to the sport
Naming people as fit and proper and then pulling the rug now that's Prejudicial to the sport.

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 7:03 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

Bloody hell, im pretty sure there will be a fair few squeeky bums and lighter wallets if the RFL suddenly starts clamping down on people swearing

So tell us, which other operational rules do you think the RFL should ignore?

Re: The mad doctor : Tue Mar 11, 2014 7:13 pm  

bezzerscr wrote:

Well done RFL trying to silence someone...

That's what you got from reading that news report?

Really?

I know you've all got a bit precious in Greater Manchester now you've finally got some money but that's bordering on paranoia.