gutterfax wrote:
Point of order.
snip
4. Objectives? What pray tell do you think my "objectives" are? I freely admit to being openly critical of the way the sport is run, I compare it to Union regularly as I believe with the right management, then it could be as big if not bigger than RU. I regularly criticise the London Broncos owner and senior management and often defend the club from slanderous attacks by flat earth, whippet racing pigeon fancying northerners resentful that their pit town isn't in SL....but I have no objective per say. Looking forward to your response to this part in particular.....do you really think I am that influential that my posts on here can make a difference
Whine away all you like or better still, put me on ignore, but I have broken no rules and will continue to question the way the sport is governed in the UK.
I'm not a naturally negative person so I don't see things the way you do, but i do find your comments interesting.
I don't think you should be banned (unless you break the rules same as anyone else)
The thing is though, in point 4, if you don't think your comments are going to make any difference.......apart from winding people up on here, why make them?
The only conclussion is you are doing it to, dare I say it, wind people up.
I think your comparisons to Rugby Union are more valid than that.
Although I'm 100% League, I have played Union for a lot of years and been part of the club set up. There is no doubt Union management and marketing (and money) is significantly better than League, however, everything in Union is not rosey and there are plenty of things they are trying to learn from us. (the difference is they do learn)
The problem is, when you only state the negative, you come across as pro Union and Anti League, which unfortunately has no real place on here.