Summer rugby... Translation: rugby in June/July as opposed to Dec/Jan... the game has paid a huge price in terms of lack of interest, lower attendances and lower profile of RL internationals, Challenge Cup and the Championship tiers. The SL play-offs have suffered even more in terms of poor attendances since the introduction of the current licenced 14 teams, Top 8 play-offs.
My opinion is that the game continues to pay way too high a price in order to accommodate a mere two months worth of meaningless regular season SL fixtures, because that is all the switch to a summer season amounts to... 7 or 8 rounds of meaningless SL. Leeds for instance don't even bother waking up until August, and don't start playing for real until September!
GansonTheClown wrote:
Or do you think if we go down to 12 teams, top 5 play-off and P&R we'll be fine?
It's a better structure than the failed version of licensed mediocrity that we currently have.
Im sure you can provide us with the figures to prove that fewer people are attending challenge cup, international and lower league games as a whole. You clearly have the time to, and are telling us you are able to.
Im sure you can provide us with the figures to prove that fewer people are attending challenge cup, international and lower league games as a whole. You clearly have the time to, and are telling us you are able to.
Im sure you can provide us with the figures to prove that fewer people are attending challenge cup, international and lower league games as a whole. You clearly have the time to, and are telling us you are able to.
Crack on………….
I've provided the reference above. If it's too hard for you to research the reference, just say so.
Im sure you can provide us with the figures to prove that fewer people are attending challenge cup, international and lower league games as a whole. You clearly have the time to, and are telling us you are able to.
Crack on………….
I've provided the reference above. If it's too hard for you to research the reference, just say so.
Blake Solly said: "2013 will also see more commercial income flow into Rugby League than at any time in its history and with a growing stable of sponsors and partners on board, the sport is approaching the new season with confidence.
William Eve wrote:
I've provided the reference above. If it's too hard for you to research the reference, just say so.
Blake Solly said: "2013 will also see more commercial income flow into Rugby League than at any time in its history and with a growing stable of sponsors and partners on board, the sport is approaching the new season with confidence.
was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:
You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
Shush don't tell gutters, he thinks other sports are riding the crest of an Olympic wave whilst SL is being left behind
the only figures that are important to RL are 11.5% down in the Superleague and 15.5% down in the challenge cup......the only comp I found that had comparable losses in the last 18 months was League 1 which suffered as Sheffield Wednesday went up and the Heineken Cup that had 30,000 missing seats at it's final.
SmokeyTA wrote:
The RFL brought in more sponsorship money from having numerous different sponsors than they did from having 1 single sponsor.
I am so looking forward to the release of the 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 RFL accounts........Engage paid 1.7 million a year.......if the foxy bingo et al generate that level of cash, then I'm a chinaman
They generated more cash than last year.....that's for sure , but seriously....do you think any of these smaller sponsors are paying up front hard cash in decent amounts you need your head looking at.
For those citing attendances at football as an indication that it's only RL that's suffering, outside of a small handfull of Prem clubs, there are discounts galore and very few sellouts over the past few years. Prime example was last weekends Burnley v Blackburn .... local derby, opening fixture of a new season, hyped to death by Sky, tickets priced at £15 (50% discount) yet attendance was just over 12,000 ...... down from 21,000 last season!
I'll bet there isn't a thread similar to this in Tartball Land screaming about the complete collapse of Championship level football.
People simply haven't got money to throw at any league based sports events week after week - they are holding money back for one-off games.
Think you might want to re-read that. It was actually Burnley vs Bolton, not Blackburn. Aside from the first 1,250 tickets which were priced at £12.50 (subsidised by the Football League as part of the 125th anniversary), the cheapest match tickets were £28 and the game was an unattractive 12.15 kick off live on telly.
I actually get a little tiresome of this "football is so expensive" lark. My Leigh season ticket cost £200 for 13 games, my Bolton one has cost £295 for 23 games. RL is truly in danger of pricing itself out of the market.
was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have
eels fan wrote:
You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.
RL is truly in danger of pricing itself out of the market.
What would you consider a fair price for a SL season Ticket? I believe the average walk up price is about 20 notes....personally, I believe a ST holder should be charged at about a tenner a game.....any more than that and I believe people decide to pick and choose what games to go to and attendances suffer.
6500 ST holders at 180 a pop or 9,000 at 130.......I'd rather have the 9,000 with 2,500 more people spending cash in the ground...32,500 more shoppers over a season. The trick is, to budget for this over a 10 year period.....get people back into the habit of attending every game.....don't do it for 2 years and bank on a massive initial uptake......it has to be gradually built up.
The Long game isn't really the RFL's thing though...is it?
Luck is a combination of preparation and opportunity
Just to avoid confusion Starbug is the username of Steven Pike
SOMEBODY SAID that it couldn’t be done But he with a chuckle replied That “maybe it couldn’t,” but he would be one Who wouldn’t say so till he’d tried. So he buckled right in with the trace of a grin On his face. If he worried he hid it. He started to sing as he tackled the thing That couldn’t be done, and he did it!
Blake Solly said: "2013 will also see more commercial income flow into Rugby League than at any time in its history and with a growing stable of sponsors and partners on board, the sport is approaching the new season with confidence.