Re: Wakey stadium plans collapse- again. : Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:57 am
Mr Dog wrote:
AFAIK, even if the controversial cold store is included, the development hasn't reached the trigger point for the stadium build so how do they enforce the S106? Also, I can't understand why Wake haven't had them in court by now - surely the threat would have been enough if they have a cast iron case...
You are correct that the developer has done nothing illegal. Morally and ethically somewhat questionable, but legally OK.
I would think any court proceedings (judicial review ) would be against the local authority and its role in all this rather than the developer.