Roy Haggerty wrote:
Every other club in SL has had to make arrangements to play in fit fir purpose stadiums. Sometimes at a cost the club has struggled to bear.
Have they? Really? They've all piggy-backed other developments.
A brief history, if it helps:
- developer gets sweetened land deal on the back of a promise to council to build a stadium (as has happened elsewhere)
- once land is developed, developer refuses to build
- Council agrees to further development outside scope of original promise so doesn't have to enforce promise
- Belle Vue goes up for sale. Trinity told not to bid for it as will be bought by original developer to fulfil promise
- original developer does not bid for it and bought by someone else
- new owner wants to develop and is promising to rebuild stadium as the sweetener
- club owner senses another trap and say want it on the terms promised by the original developer that got the very first sweetened land deal
- Council spit out dummy
Complicating factors:
- council run by a Castleford season ticket holder who seems intent on shafting Trinity
- a prominent person on the original Trust that had the job of delivering the stadium left and was said to be setting up his own Trust
- talk is now of "commercial rent"
The one thing that is different now is that the club is no longer willing to be taken for a mug by people who see the desire for a new stadium as a way of furthering their own agenda/profits/schemes.