Re: Play-Offs: Batley : Tue Sep 28, 2021 4:39 pm  

Well it seems if you’re a Wales favourite you cannot be dropped despite losing your side the game and offering nothing when you’re given another chance to redeem yourself in the next match. To say Fleming has some size to him, he rarely seems to punch through the defence from what I’ve seen him which admittedly is a bit limited by my own admission. I’d rather we’d kept a Kirk, at least he was a grafter.

Re: Play-Offs: Batley : Tue Sep 28, 2021 6:40 pm  

Peter Goddard wrote:

Did anyone notice (I think it was Brown) stamp on Flanagan's ankle? I wonder if anything will happen about this. If it had been the other way round George would be looking at a 5 match ban.

I see he got away with it at the RFL naughty boys meeting.

Re: Play-Offs: Batley : Tue Sep 28, 2021 8:10 pm  

Marvin Goolash wrote:

I see he got away with it at the RFL naughty boys meeting.

Well he got found guilty of intentionally standing on an opponent, yet its grade A zero games. I must be missing something if intentionally standing on an opponent is worth zero games.

Re: Play-Offs: Batley : Tue Sep 28, 2021 8:21 pm  

Bull Mania wrote:

Well he got found guilty of intentionally standing on an opponent, yet its grade A zero games. I must be missing something if intentionally standing on an opponent is worth zero games.

You're dead right. What a ridiculous rule, guilty but zero ban. What's that about. Like I said before if it had been George a 5 game ban would ensue.