RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Friendly: Keighley
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 8:57 am  
Stockwell & Smales Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:02 pm
Posts: 256
After that performance I fear the worst for next week. Apart from Brough, England, Fleming, Walker and Scurr we were very poor. Only Brough has the ability to create anything from half back so our attack in opposition 20 is dire. Could be 30-50 drubbing next week.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:07 am  

Pyrah123 wrote:
Pyrah123 Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:36 am
Posts: 397
Stockwell & Smales wrote:
After that performance I fear the worst for next week. Apart from Brough, England, Fleming, Walker and Scurr we were very poor. Only Brough has the ability to create anything from half back so our attack in opposition 20 is dire. Could be 30-50 drubbing next week.

Only thing to hope mate last year we beat them by 6 the year before by a point, these are never 50 point wins maybe it will be better with a more settled 17 and players playing in there correct position? I must may I’d be tempted to play Sanderson before Brown I don’t know what everyone else thinks? And maybe race as the other half as he will be fit for Featherstone as Jowitt for me looked out of his depth there maybe because he is really a fullback
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:13 am  
Stockwell & Smales Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:02 pm
Posts: 256
I agree lets get Sanderson more infield. I think the only passes he got yesterday was when he came infield looking for work. Would like to see him running the ball out from full back if we move Pick to half back.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:13 pm  

User avatarBullseye wrote:
Bullseye User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2001 12:04 pm
Posts: 30174
Location: The Corridor of Uncertainty
The complacency and lack of humility that Kear referred to is a worry. Drubbing incoming vs Fev unless that is addressed.
"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:43 pm  

RagingBull wrote:
RagingBull Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:46 pm
Posts: 720
Pyrah123 wrote:
Only thing to hope mate last year we beat them by 6 the year before by a point, these are never 50 point wins maybe it will be better with a more settled 17 and players playing in there correct position? I must may I’d be tempted to play Sanderson before Brown I don’t know what everyone else thinks? And maybe race as the other half as he will be fit for Featherstone as Jowitt for me looked out of his depth there maybe because he is really a fullback


The last 2 times weve played them at their place they have hammered us 42 - 4 and 44 - 18 so it wasnt far off. :CRAZY:
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:54 pm  

JohnQ wrote:
JohnQ Stevo's Armpit

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:10 pm
Posts: 71
Reliance on a 38 year old staying fit isn't great.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:38 pm  

User avatarBull Mania wrote:
Bull Mania User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 8:47 am
Posts: 6289
JohnQ wrote:
Reliance on a 38 year old staying fit isn't great.


Reliance on anyone being fit isn't ideal. Lee Gaskell at 25 should have been peak fitness but was constantly out injured for us

Brough has being relatively fit throughout his career to be fair. But if he was to get a long term injury it would be massive for us.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:47 pm  

User avatarBull Mania wrote:
Bull Mania User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 8:47 am
Posts: 6289
Bullseye wrote:
The complacency and lack of humility that Kear referred to is a worry. Drubbing incoming vs Fev unless that is addressed.


I'm glad Kear picked up on that. I've said a few times how much I enjoyed the beginning of last year because whilst we weren't the best, we looked like a hungry team willing to work their nads off their team mates. Yesterday we just went through the motions.

On the plus side, no injuries. Considering both our opponents have each suffered long-term injuries to players, that's at least one positive for us.

Lots to rectify but that's what friendlies are for. Need to find solutions to those issues now. As someone said earlier I think theres a decent team in there, but we're not good enough to go through the motions and then just turn it on.
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:13 pm  

Pyrah123 wrote:
Pyrah123 Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:36 am
Posts: 397
RagingBull wrote:
The last 2 times weve played them at their place they have hammered us 42 - 4 and 44 - 18 so it wasnt far off. :CRAZY:

Oh are you referring to the trial games like I was?
Re: Friendly: Keighley Sun Mar 14, 2021 6:06 pm  

RagingBull wrote:
RagingBull Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:46 pm
Posts: 720
JohnQ wrote:
Reliance on a 38 year old staying fit isn't great.


Agreed. I dont think its realistic to expect a 38 year old to play every game and i suspect me may see his workoad 'managed' through out the year.
I remember Jake Webster not being selected when we played on the 4g pitches so i wonder if Kear will apply the same to DB. Might not see him feature at London, Newcastle or Widnes
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bull Mania, bull on a canary, Bulls Boy 2011, ChinaBull, Ewwenorfolk, jeffvickers, kaybenbull, le penguin, mo666, paulwalker71, Peregrine, sirkeith, woolly07 and 238 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to Bradford Bulls - RedAmberandBlack.net


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDTEAM
5,186,5911,94378,6789,567LOGIN
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre
Sun 1st Aug
NRL RND: 20 St.George14-50Souths
NRL RND: 20 Newcastle34-24Canberra
NRL RND: 20 Melbourne37-10Penrith
CH
LIVE
Dewsbury18-22Swinton
CH
LIVE
Featherstone6-23Toulouse
CH
LIVE
Halifax24-21Bradford
CH
LIVE
Newcastle14-20Whitehaven
CH
LIVE
Oldham20-30LondonB
CH
LIVE
Widnes16-34Batley
L1
LIVE
Doncaster24-46Hunslet
L1
LIVE
Crusaders72-0West Wales
L1
LIVE
Rochdale20-42Keighley
SL
LIVE
Wigan50-6Leigh
Sat 31st Jul
L1 RND: 12 LondonS12-14Coventry
Fri 30th Jul
NRL RND: 20 Wests16-18NZ Warriors
NRL RND: 20 Brisbane37-18NQL Cowboys
Thu 29th Jul
NRL RND: 20 Sydney28-0Parramatta
SLRND: 16 Catalans40-20Wakefield
SL RND: 16 Hull FC12-22Leeds
Wed 28th Jul
SL RND: 16 Warrington21-8Wigan
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
National Rugby League 2021 ROUND : 20
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Melbourne 19 689 224 465 34
Penrith 19 521 228 293 32
Souths 19 613 382 231 32
Parramatta 19 484 295 189 26
Sydney 19 509 343 166 26
Manly 18 529 378 151 22
Cronulla 18 370 418 -48 16
Canberra 19 383 465 -82 16
 
St.George 19 382 464 -82 16
Newcastle 19 325 472 -147 16
Gold Coast 18 426 478 -52 14
NZ Warriors 19 373 502 -129 12
Wests 19 412 564 -152 12
NQL Cowboys 19 358 584 -226 12
Brisbane 19 331 578 -247 10
Canterbury 18 236 566 -330 4
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Super League XXVI ROUND : 16
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Catalans 15 459 246 213 28 186.59 93.33
St.Helens 12 286 96 190 20 297.92 83.33
Warrington 14 429 221 208 21 194.12 75
Wigan 16 255 289 -34 20 88.24 62.50
Hull FC 13 298 237 61 15 125.74 57.69
Hull KR 11 271 244 27 12 111.07 54.55
 
Leeds 15 354 263 91 16 134.60 53.33
Castleford 14 251 354 -103 12 70.90 42.86
Salford 14 237 405 -168 8 58.52 28.57
Huddersfield 15 244 318 -74 8 76.73 26.67
Wakefield 16 279 394 -115 8 70.81 25
Leigh 13 212 508 -296 0 41.73 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Championship 2021 ROUND : 15
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Toulouse 10 456 94 362 20 485.11 100
Featherstone 14 579 189 390 26 306.35 92.86
Halifax 15 422 220 202 22 191.82 73.33
LondonB 14 404 357 47 19 113.17 67.86
Batley 15 404 302 102 20 133.77 66.67
Bradford 14 375 339 36 18 110.62 64.29
 
Whitehaven 15 297 410 -113 13 72.44 43.33
Widnes 14 323 378 -55 11 85.45 39.29
Sheffield 14 313 413 -100 11 75.79 39.29
Newcastle 14 298 420 -122 11 70.95 39.29
York 14 345 327 18 10 105.50 35.71
Dewsbury 14 215 401 -186 9 53.62 32.14
Oldham 14 210 500 -290 4 42 14.29
Swinton 15 256 547 -291 2 46.80 6.67
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred League One 2021 ROUND : 12
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Barrow 11 382 162 220 19 235.80 86.36
Workington 9 334 158 176 15 211.39 83.33
Doncaster 11 348 251 97 15 138.65 68.18
Crusaders 11 328 318 10 12 103.14 54.55
Keighley 12 410 279 131 13 146.95 54.17
Hunslet 12 334 301 33 11 110.96 45.83
 
Coventry 11 258 264 -6 10 97.73 45.45
Rochdale 11 299 322 -23 10 92.86 45.45
LondonS 12 192 350 -158 7 54.86 29.17
West Wales 12 122 564 -442 0 21.63 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Womens Super League 2021 ROUND : 9
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
LeedsW 7 364 38 326 14 957.89 100
St.HelensW 7 370 36 334 12 1,027.78 85.71
WiganW 6 222 64 158 10 346.88 83.33
YorkW 6 186 102 84 8 182.35 66.67
CastlefordW 6 166 96 70 8 172.92 66.67
BradfordW 8 158 264 -106 6 59.85 37.50
 
Hudds W 7 104 288 -184 4 36.11 28.57
Wire W 8 150 334 -184 4 44.91 25
FeatherstoneW 8 122 338 -216 4 36.09 25
WakefieldW 7 50 332 -282 0 15.06 0
RLFANS Recent Posts




X