Re: Diskin: The officials have too much impact on the game : Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:37 pm
darnoc wrote:
It isnt. It is peripheral information. The only thing that matters is if you made notes on a match because that is what you were mocked for. The who's, whats, wheres and whys are irrelevant.
Who's backtracking? YOU made them relevant.
You wrote:
darnoc wrote:
Just to refresh your memory, you were obscenely bitter about Saints and felt that they 
got away with a lot. You then tried to prove this by making notes when you was at a pub watching a match. The post you made was literally 3 mins 25 seconds Cunnigham high tackle with no penalty.....4mins 15 seconds, Hooper late hit on kicker no penalty etc etc.
got away with a lot. You then tried to prove this by making notes when you was at a pub watching a match. The post you made was literally 3 mins 25 seconds Cunnigham high tackle with no penalty.....4mins 15 seconds, Hooper late hit on kicker no penalty etc etc."Literally" 100% of that post is wrong. I wasn't bitter about Saints, I didn't try to prove it by making notes, and there was no mention of players who weren't involved in that match.
If you'd said, "Fishsta made some notes about a match once", you'd have been correct. But I'll say again, as I did then, that is exactly what any journalist or statistician would do on a regular basis. I take it that's "Incredibly sad" too.
What's sad is that you felt the need to hijack a thread on the Bulls board purely to hurl insults at me, using lies and inaccuracies with idiotic abandon. I've shown you up, now go and grow up.
And decide which team you're supporting. Funny how you've ignored that one throughout... suitably embarrassed?
Apologies to the Bulls fans here for feeding the troll, but he deserved everything he got there.
Ta-ra, now.
p.s. I gave up the Trombone and Banding in 2004.
it was feckin dull though. 
