: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:30 am  

also a quote from that link is

"“But I’d have been more disappointed if I’d have been on the other side and got totally dominated.”"

I'm not sure about that, surely to them it's a point won rather than a point lost. With the amount of possession and territory we had i'd be concerned about the fact we couldn't break the line or that we conceded in the manner that we did.

But it's ok at least we won the battle of the stats....apart from the one that mattered, the score

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:51 am  

Northern Lad wrote:

also a quote from that link is

"“But I’d have been more disappointed if I’d have been on the other side and got totally dominated.”"

I'm not sure about that, surely to them it's a point won rather than a point lost. With the amount of possession and territory we had i'd be concerned about the fact we couldn't break the line or that we conceded in the manner that we did.

But it's ok at least we won the battle of the stats....apart from the one that mattered, the score

Maybe the 'execution' problem is generally easier to put right than the 'being dominated' problem?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:34 pm  

redeverready wrote:

So that's some one who didn't see the game clapping some who didn't see the game interesting.

Sorry for having a christening to go to. I take it you have never missed a match?

That said I need to have a word with my mate as his wedding was on the day of the first challenge cup final at Wembley

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:22 pm  

ex Bull Dog wrote:

Sorry for having a christening to go to. I take it you have never missed a match?

That said I need to have a word with my mate as his wedding was on the day of the first challenge cup final at Wembley

In 1929 what are you ? a medium

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:54 pm  

roversmad wrote:

In 1929 what are you ? a medium

Mediums predict the future. Why would he be one of them?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:04 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Mediums predict the future. Why would he be one of them?

I thought they spoke to the voices of the past. Who does seances then?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:04 pm  

debaser wrote:

I thought they spoke to the voices of the past. Who does seances then?

I mean apart from gullible idiots obviously...

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:47 pm  

Maybe the 'execution' problem is generally easier to put right than the 'being dominated' problem?

I agree under normal circumstances but the issue i think this runs over from last season, creativity seems to be our issue and I think it was last year.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:01 pm  

debaser wrote:

I thought they spoke to the voices of the past. Who does seances then?

apologies. Let me off, it's my birthday today.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:07 pm  

No1_Saints _Fan wrote:

Disappointing for Bradford. On paper they were much better.

Thanks for that tremendous post,on paper???