: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:43 pm  

Bullpower wrote:

In fairness (even though I find that hard ) he's not actually said the "Mc" word yet . . . . although he has intimated it.

We're all "Doooooooooomed"

If we don't win our next 3 then i'm sure well hear something to do with it.

[Bullseye]

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:44 pm  

Bullpower wrote: Looks like Langers and Solo will be out for a while A blow but I think Cook can come in cover for Langley adequately. As for Solo we'll miss his creativity despite his penchant for pies. I was impressed today with Scruton and Menzies ability to offload the ball. If they evere get some support we'll look like scoring more often.

Bullpower wrote: Looks like Langers and Solo will be out for a while A blow but I think Cook can come in cover for Langley adequately. As for Solo we'll miss his creativity despite his penchant for pies. I was impressed today with Scruton and Menzies ability to offload the ball. If they evere get some support we'll look like scoring more often.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:44 pm  

think its time to sit platt out in the reserves for a while, and give young kieren hyde a shot early on in the season where there is not as much pressure, after all he is an out and out full back with bags of pace

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:56 pm  

smytho wrote:

think its time to sit platt out in the reserves for a while, and give young kieren hyde a shot early on in the season where there is not as much pressure, after all he is an out and out full back with bags of pace

Don't these early games count towards the final reckoning then?

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:59 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Beating the top sides or improving it?

Both.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:02 pm  

debaser wrote:

Don't these early games count towards the final reckoning then?

yes they do but its also an opportunaty to experiment, after all we have lost the 1st 5 games of the season in the past and still won the GF

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:03 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Just not good enough. Again.

Out of pure interest, is this comment based on the score alone, the score plus an internet report or the score plus radio commentery?

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:04 pm  

Bullpower wrote:

Come on ME. You've been dancing around actually "say it" all afternoon. You must be positively bursting wanting to.

Stop dancing. Stop intimating. Stop choosing your words ever sooooo carefully.

You do know that you will NEVER make 10 game, don't you.

Just say it . . . . .

The thing is, whilst I would rather wait and see how things pan out, it will basically be a futile exercise.

I won't start any polls, and I will not call for his head before week ten, but anyone who thinks that my opinion of the coach has changed until now are completely wrong.

What does interest me though is reading how many posts are regurgitating the same old problems from last season. He has changed nothing and solved nothing. He does not know how to.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:04 pm  

or hoe about th try that was dissallowed even though thgere was nothing wrong with it as for rovers being mediorty your wrong well be up there this year, but i will strech my neck ouyt to say that bradfored will be top 3 this year. maybe.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:06 pm  

AndreaB wrote:

Out of pure interest, is this comment based on the score alone, the score plus an internet report or the score plus radio commentery?

All three.

You were there, is it good enough for you?