Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:19 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Are you sure about that now?

Dear dear.......

yes

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:57 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

yes

I am pretty certain that that was not what was written there earlier. Someone has been busy at the editing suite methinks.

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:57 pm  

double post

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:38 pm  

As i said last season,he should not be in a job!3 and a half years for what?total joke!

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:49 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

I am pretty certain that that was not what was written there earlier. Someone has been busy at the editing suite methinks.

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:22 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

I am pretty certain that that was not what was written there earlier. Someone has been busy at the editing suite methinks.

It definately didn't say that earlier.

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:39 am  

debaser wrote:

It definately didn't say that earlier.

If you edit a post after someone else has posted on the thread, it comes up as "edited x times..."??

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:44 am  

Adeybull wrote:

If you edit a post after someone else has posted on the thread, it comes up as "edited x times..."??

It does. But somehow this one hasn't. It said something like..."level with Saints on points" I think.

Its Postgate. Maybe a tory MP has hacked into someone's account.

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:46 am  

debaser wrote:

It definately didn't say that earlier.

Hmmm. Much as I suspected. The post said that we were level on points with Leeds with a game in hand, and now it is changed both on the original post and my reply.

Who then, is the sneaky mod with an agenda as I guess that only they could have done this without leaving a trace?

Re: Renamed: the big fat McNamara thread : Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:48 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Who then, is the sneaky mod with an agenda as I guess that only they could have done this without leaving a trace.

Is this down to the free masons or the catholic church or something?