[Bulliac]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 11:59 am  

Bullseye wrote:

I’m not sure where how you get that conclusion Bulliac.

I read and it all goes through the mincer, tbh!

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:26 pm  

bulls2487 wrote:

I had heard that he potentially had an issue that may affect his bid.

Would you care to explain?

[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:33 pm  

There's been a lot of rubbish flying around about Green on social media and elsewhere. A lot of it utter rubbish IMO.

As I see it he's just run out of money. Mistakes along the way haven't helped and he could possibly have handled things better - the benefit of hindsight.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:00 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

There's been a lot of rubbish flying around about Green on social media and elsewhere. A lot of it utter rubbish IMO.

As I see it he's just run out of money. Mistakes along the way haven't helped and he could possibly have handled things better - the benefit of hindsight.

The man has lied to employees on a fairly consistent basis over the last three months at least. The fact he hasn't paid tax which by the way he will have deducted from employees salaries stinks enough. Coming out with constant lines of BS regarding why payments are late, e.g. Changing banks, really takes the urine and he treats people with no respect for their intelligence.

Your defence of him is quite staggering.

[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:13 pm  

el red wrote:

The man has lied to employees on a fairly consistent basis over the last three months at least. The fact he hasn't paid tax which by the way he will have deducted from employees salaries stinks enough. Coming out with constant lines of BS regarding why payments are late, e.g. Changing banks, really takes the urine and he treats people with no respect for their intelligence.

Your defence of him is quite staggering.

Calm down dear.

Just being careful what I say. I suggest you do the same. Where is your evidence that he's not paid money that was deducted from employees salaries? The thing with HMRC was to do with VAT apparently. Be careful what you say.

The fact that he's run out of money and made mistakes is irrefutable.

The rest, well we can form our own opinion but we need to be careful what we put on public forums.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:38 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Calm down dear.

Just being careful what I say. I suggest you do the same. Where is your evidence that he's not paid money that was deducted from employees salaries? The thing with HMRC was to do with VAT apparently. Be careful what you say.

The fact that he's run out of money and made mistakes is irrefutable.

The rest, well we can form our own opinion but we need to be careful what we put on public forums.

I would have thought there's enough in el red's post for Green to claw some of his money back through the libel courts (unless it's true, of course).

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:45 pm  

Is it the responsibility of the administrators to get as much money for the creditors as possible or are they allowed to take in to account the long term future of the Bulls?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:46 pm  

Can some of the more knowledgeable on here clear a few points up. The role of the Administrator, is he appointed to get the best deal for the creditors..?? are his hands tied or can he accept a lower offer for the club as a going concern if the prospective owner shows he has funds to invest in the clubs future ( ie he is not going to settle any further debts above what he pays the administrator)...O

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:47 pm  

I must learn to type faster...lol

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:49 pm  

I always thought it was down to him to get the best deal for the creditors and nothing more. But the current administrator seems to be making noises suggesting the long term future of the club is also quite a large consideration, which is different to how I've always understood it before.