: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:42 pm
To be fair to Mr Hood and all involved I think the bits about moving the ground around etc are just statements of the obvious. With money (hopefully) coming from various sources it`s pretty obvious that there will be various shades of opinion on what the finished article will look like.
There is no statement of intent to do (or sanction) anything in particular, nor even any suggestion that any particular plan has been proposed, just an acceptance that we can`t rule out anything and have a veto on things we might not be totally happy with; if we want the ground improving then there
maybe the odd con to go with the pros.
Quite statesmanlike, IMHO.