: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:59 am  

ex Bull Dog wrote:

Thats a load of bo%&$cks

Its Not mate, Its FACT Im afraid.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:59 am  

A Saints fan and a rhino fan arguing on the Bulls board about who knows most or least about rugby league! Excellent!

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:31 am  

rhinoms wrote:

...
IF you look at who was around and on the top of their game when fielden got his award then it's safe to say that there were candidates who'd done better both domestically in a harder league and on the international stage.

It is not "safe to say" at all. FYI I watch a lot of league, including all the NRL games. I watched them that year too. And of course I watched Fielden every week. Now, there were an awful lot of good forwards in the world, but the only point that I made was that Fielden was "ARGUABLY the best forward in the world". As he was the official holder of that title, a fact which you seemingly didn't know, I reckon that only troll, or maybe if you did know, a dolt would say it was not "arguable".

Of course, argument about who is/was the best is the lifeblood of rugby discussions, and I wouldn't have it any other way, but all YOU posted in your reply directly to me was:

LMFAO!!

which I believe means that your "argument" about my statement, that Fielden was "arguably" the best forward at that time, was
"Laughing My Fscking Ar.se Off"

rhinoms wrote:

...Again you resort to petty insults because i don't agree with your opinion or that of an award received by a bulls player(which has nothing to do with my opinion).

But you don't consider that this may be because you started it?

rhinoms wrote:

...Like i said previous there's no doubt he was the best over here but imo not better than the ones i listed that is of course if i'm allowed an opinion.

Ahh, yes, and indeed in your LATER posts you did advance an opinion! You see, you can do it. And you can also see that if you'd done it in the first place, instead of being so rude, you wouldn't have got back what you got.

rhinoms wrote:

...Yet again anyone who disagree's with you are labelled trolls

As pointed out, it's not "disagreement" which I took issue with, it was your post, which was a plain and simple troll. And, of course, you are well known fro regularly trolling on RAB. Or do you deny that?

You know the funniest thing, because you won't understand it, is that you yourself, in this very thread, did a bit of pot/kettle calling, when you replied to someone else:-

rhinoms wrote:

...
I like the way you've proved your argument and put your well thought out response into words

If you are prepared to think about it, that's exactly what you did yourself: "LMFAO". Remember?

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:18 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

It is not "safe to say" at all. FYI I watch a lot of league, including all the NRL games. I watched them that year too. And of course I watched Fielden every week. Now, there were an awful lot of good forwards in the world, but the only point that I made was that Fielden was "ARGUABLY the best forward in the world". As he was the official holder of that title, a fact which you seemingly didn't know, I reckon that only troll, or maybe if you did know, a dolt would say it was not "arguable".

Of course, argument about who is/was the best is the lifeblood of rugby discussions, and I wouldn't have it any other way, but all YOU posted in your reply directly to me was:

which I believe means that your "argument" about my statement, that Fielden was "arguably" the best forward at that time, was
"Laughing My Fscking Ar.se Off"


But you don't consider that this may be because you started it?


Ahh, yes, and indeed in your LATER posts you did advance an opinion! You see, you can do it. And you can also see that if you'd done it in the first place, instead of being so rude, you wouldn't have got back what you got.


As pointed out, it's not "disagreement" which I took issue with, it was your post, which was a plain and simple troll. And, of course, you are well known fro regularly trolling on RAB. Or do you deny that?

You know the funniest thing, because you won't understand it, is that you yourself, in this very thread, did a bit of pot/kettle calling, when you replied to someone else:-



If you are prepared to think about it, that's exactly what you did yourself: "LMFAO". Remember?

Which i backed up with a reason why i thought that did i not??
Maybe the original response wasn't merited without a reason i agree but you do imo put people down as trolls and dismiss their points if they aren't in full agreement with what you see as the facts.

[Bullseye]

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:38 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

Maybe the original response wasn't merited.

I'd have stopped there if I were you.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:19 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

...Maybe the original response wasn't merited without a reason i agree but you do imo put people down as trolls and dismiss their points if they aren't in full agreement with what you see as the facts.

OK then put your money where your mouth is, and quote one single post of mine where I have ever done that.

I've done quite a few, so you've plenty to go at.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:43 pm  

redamberblackbull wrote:

i have heard from a very good source that he will be going down under after his bulls contract!

Wouldn't be exactly shocking, he seems to like going their in the off season was their during the world cup and i'm sure i heard he was off this year. Shame Peacock and Fielden didn't fancy it. Plus england or australia.. i'd pick australia if i had a choice!!

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:08 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

OK then put your money where your mouth is, and quote one single post of mine where I have ever done that.

I've done quite a few, so you've plenty to go at.

I don't save posts nor do i intend scrolling through all your posts but i'm sure mystic eddie to name 1 will agree!!

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:23 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

I don't save posts nor do i intend scrolling through all your posts but i'm sure mystic eddie to name 1 will agree!!

Put up or shut up

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:09 pm  

bobsmyuncle wrote:

Put up or shut up

NO!