: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:41 pm  

We're obsessed?



This from a man who has now made pretty much THE self same post, changing the odd word here and there, but saying pretty much the same thing, since the early Middle Ages?

Well, you should know about obsession, that's for sure!

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:47 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

:?

Consider you quoted him and when you do so it makes the small print quite readable, your defence carries no weight whatsoever.

Sorry, I couldn't read it.

And tiny print still isn't irony.

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:50 pm  

Beechwood Bull wrote:

Sorry, I couldn't read it.

And tiny print still isn't irony.

Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.

The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).

Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:53 pm  

Paul124897 wrote:

Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.

The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).

Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..

So totally pointless then?

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:43 pm  

Beechwood Bull wrote:

So totally pointless then?

Look pal. You made yourself look stupid. Trying to backtrack and deflect the blow is a bit futile TBH.

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:44 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Well, you should know about obsession, that's for sure!

I do indeed. Hence why I recognise YOUR obsession.

: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:39 pm  

Paul124897 wrote:

Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.

The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).

Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..

You've caught a whopper.

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:05 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

TBH I am puzzled as to why the likes of you and your fellow club parrot (and anagram of you) FA are so obsessed. OK, I was prepared to cut the coach a bit of slack but the bigger picture just does not lead to believe that he is anything else but incapable of coaching our side competently. By all means copy this out toname and shame me at the fans forum (you too Mr Duffy) because there is no reason to suggest that we are going anywhere else but backwards under Steve McNamara.

His 2009 recruitment is questionable TBH and I just have no confidence in him whatsoever. As I have been saying for a while now, he will soon prove me 100% correct.

Whoah there, no obsession and no attack intended. I thought the Agatha Christie reference would have underlined the intended jocualrity. Just genuinely interested what happened to make you sympathise with SM for a short while there.

As for the parrot jibe, I've never heard Hood or Duffy compare McNamara to Clement Attlee (or Barack Obama ). By the way, do you think Attlee was crap? Or do the circumstances in which he became PM have to be taken into account? Just you've never said...

: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:45 am  

mystic eddie wrote:

Look pal. You made yourself look stupid. Trying to backtrack and deflect the blow is a bit futile TBH.

Being caught out over denying what that you called SM McBanana must have hurt but this is desperate even from you.

: Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:05 am  

Hutchie wrote:

Who would you have in his place ??

Paul Cullen