Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 7:56 am  

After Martyn Sadler's tweet yesterday, maybe professional journalists will hold opinions/information back until something more definite happens?

All except Game Caller Gledhill probably, although I use the phrase "professional journalist" very loosely in his case. In his defence I am sure he has had a lot on his plate these last few days. Maybe more than Nigel Wood or Sir Eric Pickles.

I'll get my coat...

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:21 am  

So, it's last roll of the dice Friday today?

Either way it seems the Bulls are destined for the knacker's yard.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:25 am  

I said yesterday, take everything any journo says with a pinch of salt. Even those running the big league papers have been wrong loads over this affair. I'd only trust anything that's official and none of this "I'm told", "I'm hearing" or "I understand".

Gotta be honest, I'm losing so much will to live in this process now that I can't even be bothered reading the 7 or 8 pages of this thread I missed yesterday. Every other day I've caught up with all I've missed, but I can't even be ar$ed doing that any more now.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:25 am  

tackler thommo wrote:

No quote from Pettit since 21st December as far as I can see. So he has fueled a load of "understood","believed" stories and even more guesses. Before 21/12 he was happy to release optimistic statements without divulging names - now he stays quiet and coins in the hourly rate.
The players know nothing according to twitter accounts - grossly unfair to them and rest of Bulls Staff.
They,and we, need an update Mr Pettit.

Don't hold your breath!

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:27 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

Gotta be honest, I'm losing so much will to live in this process now that I can't even be bothered reading the 7 or 8 pages of this thread I missed yesterday. Every other day I've caught up with all I've missed, but I can't even be ar$ed doing that any more now.

Are you sure? Someone slagged you off good and proper earlier...

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:42 am  

hindle xiii wrote:

Are you sure? Someone slagged you off good and proper earlier...

RIGHT! That's me looking back over every page to find out who it..... nah, I still can't be bothered.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:46 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

RIGHT! That's me looking back over every page to find out who it..... nah, I still can't be bothered.

CBeebies is on. Watch that instead.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:48 am  

debaser wrote:

CBeebies is on. Watch that instead.

Are they slagging me off on that too?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:01 am  

Morning everyone, marvellous to be with you on the forum, for the first time today...

Another tense day ahead with the home side hoping beyond all reasonable hope for a positive outcome but you suspect a few of the opposition will be looking to really drive home any advantage they can find so we can expect a few surprise 'cloth cuttings', 'mismanagement on a monumental scale' and perhaps a 'no longer a big club' and 'RFLs favourites' along the way.... Marvellous...

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:09 am  

Key thing to remember here is RFL have backed Chalmers.

So if Liquidated there could easily be a Bradford Bullocks playing in 2017 - maybe Dewsbury/Batley could arrange a season long arrangement for the Bullocks to feature & then in 2018 - who knows?

Some lateral thinking is required here & there are enough Mavericks about to arrange.