Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:17 pm  

Yes, it was a mistake.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:23 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

It should be "An unknown superstar" not "A unknown superstar" shouldn't it?

Anyway this is heading off topic enough as it is! Please an we somehow steer it back? If people want to have an argument over semantics and how you can interpret a press report then suggest you start PM-ing each other as it's boring the rest of us.

Praise the lord

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:00 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Please an we somehow steer it back?

an we. A Pedant.

[Bullseye]

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:09 pm  

tigertot wrote:

an we. A Pedant.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:33 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

You're just proving that you were talking poop, otherwise you would of shown me a link saying that we offered more.

Bless.

I am waiting for you to prove your bold statement, that he is going to Hull for love rather than money. If you can prove it, then please do so. Otherwise I will continue to disagree with you.

Mind you I suppose there has been precedents set, Leeds' players all play for love and Warrington's get paid hardly anything, so its not impossible.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:05 pm  

League express says bulls are angry as Seymour had already agreed the contract and to sign lol

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:21 pm  

pulsator2k7 wrote:

League express says bulls are angry as Seymour had already agreed the contract and to sign lol

maybe a bit of karma for way we allegedly treated chris walker last year?. dont see how we can be too angry as we shouldnt have let the news out until it was signed and sealed. first real PR mistake weve made under bennett imo.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:27 pm  

mat wrote:

maybe a bit of karma for way we allegedly treated chris walker last year?. dont see how we can be too angry as we shouldnt have let the news out until it was signed and sealed. first real PR mistake weve made under bennett imo.

Can't really fault Andrew for this.

Ask yourself this Matt, would you really want another player taking up a large slice of the salary cap?

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:31 pm  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

Can't really fault Andrew for this.

thats not the point mick. we shouldnt have allowed the story to go out until contracts were signed. as it is we look daft and have potentially blown any chance of getting pryce back as well.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:57 pm  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

Can't really fault Andrew for this.

Ask yourself this Matt, would you really want another player taking up 10% of our overall salary cap space on top of our highest earner Kearney?

Kearney's on 160k?