Re: Chissy : Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:33 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

Taking a wild guess at this but my thoughts are as follows:

Dane did something wring was suspended and knew he was getting the sack found a new club (Bulls) Sheffield agreed to release him but then found out he was going to Bulls so thought they may have a opportunity to get some money.

Just a guess.

Best of luck if they think they can get money from us. Isn't there a saying somewhere abou getting blood out of a stone.
Also I am a bit shocked by all the people that say he couldn't have signed for us unless the RFL agreed he was free to do so. Just have two words to add Iestyn Harris.

Re: Chissy : Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:49 pm  

Dane did something wring was suspended and knew he was getting the sack found a new club (Bulls) Sheffield agreed to release him but then found out he was going to Bulls so thought they may have a opportunity to get some money.

Just a guess.[/quote]

Get some money from us all the way to the bank

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:01 am  

It looks like posturing by the Eagles they have no money to get into a legal stoush neither do the Bulls, the so called comparisons with Harris are irrelevant, the Sod Hall mob aren't going to sanction a signing if there is a real problem, its just a miffed Club doing it's best to derail the Bulls over the weekend, nothing wrong in that just a bit of gamesmanship, just roll with it as it will just go away!

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:08 am  

It says on a well known video site he has resigned for the Bulls, plus a video saying hes glad to be back

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:12 am  

The RFL don't check on the contractual position, nor should they - that would open them to possible liability. All they do is register a player. If you tell them you've signed a player you apply to register him, and if the registration is accepted then he can play for you.

Whether contractually he is still in some relationship with his former club is irrelevant. So no reason why he can't play once we hold his registration, and a contractual dispute wouldn't stop the RFL registering him (see case of Harris, I.) But if Sheffield still hold his registration, then of course he cant play for us until that changes.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 2:14 am  

AFTER TONIGHT’S EXCITING NEWS ANNOUNCING THE SIGNING OF DANE CHISHOLM AND FOLLOWING SHEFFIELD EAGLES STATEMENT.
The club will now enter into dialogue with the Rugby Football League to help clear a position of disagreement between the player and his former club.



Until the issue is resolved the club won’t be making any further comment.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:58 am  

It's a play for

A) a bit of compo
B) weakening our position for as long as possible.

I hope it comes back and bites them.

Tbf he was in the wrong getting sacked but has to be allowed to move on.
A player is no good to you if they don't want to play, we know that all to well.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:05 am  

Would Chisholm need a visa? I'm completely lost when it comes to those now. I was thinking if Yes then maybe we've finally cleared that hurdle.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:12 am  

hindle xiii wrote:

Would Chisholm need a visa? I'm completely lost when it comes to those now. I was thinking if Yes then maybe we've finally cleared that hurdle.

Somewhere I read he's a French International player so that should negate that proble~m!

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:21 am  

This is very strange, if you sack somebody can you still hold their registration?