Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:03 pm  

Surely the administrator should of already check proof of funds????

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:04 pm  

Would also like to know what Frank has to say?

Frank?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:10 pm  

Squeaky bum time. Guess all we can dk now is wait

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:18 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

Surely the administrator should of already check proof of funds????

Maybe he has. This is the RFL who are checking on them now. Maybe they don't believe the administrators.

Maybe lots of things.
Maybe I actually know nothing at all.

[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:29 pm  

Well I think we've got another 20 pages on us at least.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:32 pm  

Perhaps we should choose a forum to meet on in case we get bumped from here if we get liquidated. There are one or 2 forums that are not used by their supporters. We could go squat.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:36 pm  

Still sounds like someone in there punching above their weight to me.I feel as if the credibility of the Administration people is on the line tonight.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:53 pm  

Is it me, but surely the RFL are in a situation where it is them who will liquidate us. If so what are they going to gain? a hole in the ground that can only be used for a sport that does not have a team. Also how would the council behave towards the RFL if they did liquidise us. Common sense is for them to negotiate with the bidder if they have the funds to buy the Bulls and sell them the lease. Its obvious the lease is the sticking point, nobody would want our club as it is without it. But being the RFL common sense don`t come into it. It`s a pity Stobarts aren`t bidding the RFL would have returned the lease plus £1 million.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:03 pm  

ifallwerelikemumby wrote:

Is it me, but surely the RFL are in a situation where it is them who will liquidate us. If so what are they going to gain? a hole in the ground that can only be used for a sport that does not have a team. Also how would the council behave towards the RFL if they did liquidise us. Common sense is for them to negotiate with the bidder if they have the funds to buy the Bulls and sell them the lease. Its obvious the lease is the sticking point, nobody would want our club as it is without it. But being the RFL common sense don`t come into it. It`s a pity Stobarts aren`t bidding the RFL would have returned the lease plus £1 million.

I presume that the council would still get their rent money from the RFL

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:06 pm  

rugbyreddog wrote:

I presume that the council would still get their rent money from the RFL

Correct but that would cost the RFL alot of wasted money which they won't want to waste.