[Pumpetypump]

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:44 pm  

Outofexile wrote:

If he is a Zombie then its brains he will be eating.

He can start with Platt.

Not going to get his dinner out of that though. Nothing wrong with nibbles I suppose..

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:49 pm  

Shaggoth wrote:

Not going to get his dinner out of that though. Nothing wrong with nibbles I suppose..

Likely to suffer some huge farts afterwards though?

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:49 pm  

I wonder if the other player involved in this will have his contract terminated too....

[Pumpetypump]

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:52 pm  

debaser wrote:

I wonder if the other player involved in this will have his contract terminated too....

Hmmm one player is injury prone and ok, the other is very very talented and barely gets injured. Cynicism would point to only one answer.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:06 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Contract terminated? Warrington must be prepared to cut their losses for some reason. Maybe he's not getting over his injury or his recent troubles are an influence. I'd say it depends on those factors as to whether we should be interested.

Remember his case is sub judice until he's been sentenced so no speculation please folks.

Not necessarily. It may be possible that an employer could sack an employee found guilty of a crime. Certainly one as serious as assault.

If I was found guilty of such a crime, I would expect to be sacked.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:47 pm  

Stul wrote:

Not necessarily. It may be possible that an employer could sack an employee found guilty of a crime. Certainly one as serious as assault.

If I was found guilty of such a crime, I would expect to be sacked.

Me too. Without a doubt. And quite rightly.

[Pumpetypump]

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:54 pm  

debaser wrote:

Me too. Without a doubt. And quite rightly.

Not me. But then I am a hitman.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:55 pm  

Shaggoth wrote:

Not me. But then I am a hitman.

In that case, you didn't do the job.

So yes, definately sacked.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:58 pm  

Stul wrote:

Not necessarily. It may be possible that an employer could sack an employee found guilty of a crime. Certainly one as serious as assault.

If I was found guilty of such a crime, I would expect to be sacked.

The young reserve at Cas was sacked last week. Senior players will not be sacked like the rest of us would with serious convictions against us.


Even if they played for us I would expect them to get the boot.

[Pumpetypump]

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:01 pm  

bully boy wrote:

Even if they played for us I would expect them to get the boot.

Well it would be strange indeed to routinely sack players that test positive for banned substances like we did with Hudson but not similarly ban people who are found guilty of violent crime. However, that appears to be the case.

As a game we deem cheating far more heinous than serious assault.