: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:13 am  

King Johns II wrote:

Deacon will always be poor when he doesn't have

1 - a big pack
2 - a class no 6

At the moment u av neither

i think you're talking rubbish about not having a big pack.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:16 am  

I'd be tempted to drop Deacon altogether for the Hull game. Move Jeffries to scrum half and use Menzies at stand off.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:42 pm  

phillgee wrote:

i think you're talking rubbish about not having a big pack.

I dont think you actually remember what the start of this post thread was: -

Deacon was just awful tonight. Looks a pale imitation of the GB player he was a few seasons ago.

You didnt have a big pack on saturday night for your normal 17 and that is why I made the comment!?

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:28 pm  

af wrote:

Deacon's finest hour was the 2003 run-in when Robbie and Leon were both crocked and we had no recognised six - Mike Forshaw filling in a lot.

Daecon played well for 60 minutes 6 years ago, I find that hard to believe.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:58 pm  

tigertot wrote:

Daecon played well for 60 minutes 6 years ago, I find that hard to believe.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:16 pm  

af wrote:

Deacon's finest hour was the 2003 run-in when Robbie and Leon were both crocked and we had no recognised six - Mike Forshaw filling in a lot.

Is that when Karl Pratt played most of the time at 6 including starting the grand final there.