: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:19 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

You're entitled to that opinion, however childish, but why are you on the Bulls board, where nobody is interested in your bait or your facile views? Personal problems?

In fairness, this is how McNamara was marketed at the start of his Bradford tenure.

Childness? No. However, for the benefit of Mr S Duffy and Mr R Duckett, I would say that it was wildly inaccurate.

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:25 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Er, no.


He's just a troll, like you.


Why, sure they did. yes, we all think that. Of course we do.


You're entitled to that opinion, however childish, but why are you on the Bulls board, where nobody is interested in your bait or your facile views? Personal problems?

That would be true had the truth not backed up our points!!!
As for no interest in our posts your need to respond to them says different.
Good on you for suporting your club through thick and thin,been there and done that myself but it still doesn't mean that your slump is over-stated.

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:39 am  

rhinoms wrote:

That would be true had the truth not backed up our points!!!
As for no interest in our posts your need to respond to them says different.
Good on you for suporting your club through thick and thin,been there and done that myself but it still doesn't mean that your slump is over-stated.

What truth? Please provide details of this truth.

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:42 am  

rhinoms wrote:

That would be true had the truth not backed up our points!!!
As for no interest in our posts your need to respond to them says different.
Good on you for suporting your club through thick and thin,been there and done that myself but it still doesn't mean that your slump is over-stated.

So now you are whingeing on the basis that one person (me) actually gave you the benefit of some doubt, and took the trouble to provide a bit of a reasoned response? Weird, but fair enough, I've noted that you don't actually expect anyone to take any interest in what you write, or respond to you.

Oops, I did it again.

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:44 am  

Roofaldo wrote:

What truth? Please provide details of this truth.

We're looking . . .

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:53 am  

Looks like we'll be needing to stock up on some of THIS again . . . . .

Looks like we'll be needing to stock up on some of THIS again . . . . .

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:28 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Anyway if you think Leeds can teach Bradford anything about hookers - two words: Lumb Lane.

Indeed.

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:52 pm  

Roofaldo wrote:

What truth? Please provide details of this truth.

The truth that tad's original post stated that you're players have been average and how did FA see the signing of 2 grand final winners see the end of that!!
You see when we point out that the bulls signings apart from a couple are average and that your season's performances are average FA gets all precious and tells us we are trolls
But then again mystic eddie has had it for the last 2 years and he's a bulls fan so we shouldn't be surprised!

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:53 pm  

Bullpower wrote: Looks like we'll be needing to stock up on some of THIS again . . . . . You'll need more than 1 can with mcbannna still in charge!!

Bullpower wrote: Looks like we'll be needing to stock up on some of THIS again . . . . . You'll need more than 1 can with mcbannna still in charge!!

: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:49 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

The truth that tad's original post stated that you're players have been average and how did FA see the signing of 2 grand final winners see the end of that!!

err.. that's not how it looks when I read it

You see when we point out that the bulls signings apart from a couple are average and that your season's performances are average FA gets all precious and tells us we are trolls
But then again mystic eddie has had it for the last 2 years and he's a bulls fan so we shouldn't be surprised!

You are a troll