Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:10 pm  

What about a farmer ?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:15 pm  

[quote="herr rigsby"]What about a farmer ?[/quote

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:23 pm  

[quote="nestegg"][b]NO[/b] !!!!!!!!!

The current mix (now just increased to 7 persons) is as follows - fans / politician / press and media / creditors / Bulls insider / SE associate / Counsel, [b]and[/b] last, but most definitely [u]not[/u] least .... a meaningful backer and prospective investor.

Clearly most of the above are Bulls' fans and creditors as you'd expect; otherwise why would they bother.

All nesteggers are public spirited persons who want the Bulls to become more of a community based venture and for the fans voices to be heard and sustainably accounted for. We abhor asset stripping and shameless attempts at profiteering; not that we've seen much (if any) net profit at the Bulls for many a year. That, however, doesn't mean that cash hasn't been allegedly stripped out of the club in recent months and years.

We also want to see a formal investigation into the RFL's central and allegedly purposeful role in the decline of the Bulls in recent years.

We also have an occasional RFL informant along with other generally reliable informants.[/quote]

So if your all bulls fans why are you so happy to let the new consortium discover the next impending storm once they have taken over instead of pre warning them.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:26 pm  

nestegg wrote:

NO !!!!!!!!!

The current mix (now just increased to 7 persons) is as follows - fans / politician / press and media / creditors / Bulls insider / SE associate / Counsel, and last, but most definitely not least .... a meaningful backer and prospective investor.

Clearly most of the above are Bulls' fans and creditors as you'd expect; otherwise why would they bother.

All nesteggers are public spirited persons who want the Bulls to become more of a community based venture and for the fans voices to be heard and sustainably accounted for. We abhor asset stripping and shameless attempts at profiteering; not that we've seen much (if any) net profit at the Bulls for many a year. That, however, doesn't mean that cash hasn't been allegedly stripped out of the club in recent months and years.

We also want to see a formal investigation into the RFL's central and allegedly purposeful role in the decline of the Bulls in recent years.

We also have an occasional RFL informant along with other generally reliable informants.

Your Wakefield informant isn’t very good AD, or whatever alias you use these days

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:27 pm  

nestegg wrote:

NO !!!!!!!!!

The current mix (now just increased to 7 persons) is as follows - fans / politician / press and media / creditors / Bulls insider / SE associate / Counsel, and last, but most definitely not least .... a meaningful backer and prospective investor.

Clearly most of the above are Bulls' fans and creditors as you'd expect; otherwise why would they bother.

All nesteggers are public spirited persons who want the Bulls to become more of a community based venture and for the fans voices to be heard and sustainably accounted for. We abhor asset stripping and shameless attempts at profiteering; not that we've seen much (if any) net profit at the Bulls for many a year. That, however, doesn't mean that cash hasn't been allegedly stripped out of the club in recent months and years.

We also want to see a formal investigation into the RFL's central and allegedly purposeful role in the decline of the Bulls in recent years.

We also have an occasional RFL informant along with other generally reliable informants.

If you buy the club, I'm going to support Fax.

This language reminds me of when Mick got banned from TRL a couple of times because he couldn't control himself over referees and supposed bias.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 8:33 pm  

herr rigsby wrote:

So if your all bulls fans why are you so happy to let the new consortium discover the next impending storm once they have taken over instead of pre warning them.

That understandable query has been answered elsewhere mate.

Loved the sitcom by the way Rigsby.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:02 pm  

[quote="nestegg"]That understandable query has been answered elsewhere mate.

Loved the sitcom by the way Rigsby.[/quote]

And the answer was ?

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:16 pm  

herr rigsby wrote:

And the answer was ?

If we didn't love your sitcom we'd ask you to stop being so lazy. But as you were such a legend on the screen, we will repeat your question below, and restate our answer from earlier today:

Q - "So if your all bulls fans why are you so happy to let the new consortium discover the next impending storm once they have taken over instead of pre warning them."

A - " .... we'd like to reveal what has been going on because it is not good. But we are bound by instructions from nestegg Counsel and the authorities who have instructed us not to give out any detail as to what the 'matter' may pertain to.

As for CB our legal has made it clear that as he is not currently a BB17 shareholder, Chris is presently a virtual legal non-entity in respect of the Bulls. That said, even if he and Sawyer etc gain an interest then it's for the authorities to formally approach the club director(s); not us.

We accept that this is somewhat of a nebulous response, but we have to take heed of advice. What we can offer, however, is that when the investigations are concluded and the story is ready to be published we will forewarn the forum. Deal?"

BTW Rigsby, please read the fine print mate; we didn't say we are 'all' Bulls fans, just most of us.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:37 pm  

Right we now have Daddycool calling these idiots out. I’m sure Daddycool knows hell of a lot more about hell of a lot more than these fools.

Do we believe the owner of Wakefield Trinity or Gledhill, who just makes things up, as we all know.

Re: So who is leaving : Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:40 pm  

It’s just pathetic roger. This is peoples lives we are talking about, not a boardroom memo on champ manager 92!