: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:06 pm  

I can see a 'coming to terms' coming up.

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:26 pm  

MQBlank wrote:

, which means weight on not off,

We could lock him in a sauna for 2 months, sweat the weight off

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:03 pm  

mat wrote:

will certainly give worrincy a decent shot at establishing himself as a first team player and when it doensn't work out solomona back for business end off season ( if he can get in team obviously)

Edited fir accuracy.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:20 am  

mat wrote:

will certainly give cook and worrincy a decent shot at establishing themselves as first team players and if it doensn't work out solomona back for business end off season ( if he can get in team obviously)

Never mind get in the team, after 2 months off we'll be lucky if he can get in his shirt.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:22 pm  

redeverready wrote:

Edited fir accuracy.

must have imagined cook playing against hull kr -as we all know he's not being given a fair shot

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:20 pm  

mat wrote:

must have imagined cook playing against hull kr -as we all know he's not being given a fair shot

What's Cook got to do with anything. Just an idea Mat start reading things before make comments it helps.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:35 pm  

redeverready wrote:

What's Cook got to do with anything. Just an idea Mat start reading things before make comments it helps.

missed your 2nd edit re:when it doesnt work out. Makes sense after reading your comments re worrincy in the other thread. Why are you so down on the lad? at least give him a couple of games before passing judgement. whilst he's certainly the most speculative of this season signings he hasnt done anything to deserve a slating yet.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:42 pm  

mat wrote:

:oops: missed your 2nd edit re:when it doesnt work out. Makes sense after reading your comments re worrincy in the other thread. Why are you so down on the lad? at least give him a couple of games before passing judgement. whilst he's certainly the most speculative of this season signings he hasnt done anything to deserve a slating yet.

For the simple reason he's never shown anything to suggest he's any good or ever will be and he's blocking Elliott Whitehead and Steve Crossley first team path.

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:19 am  

redeverready wrote:

For the simple reason he's never shown anything to suggest he's any good or ever will be and he's blocking Elliott Whitehead and Steve Crossley first team path.

worrincy isnt blocking steve crossley's path to first team. worrincys a 2nd row, crossleys a prop. Crossleys path is being blocked by burgess,lynch,scruton,kopczak and james, Would you genuinely say hes a better player at this point in time than any of those players and hence deserves there place in the pecking order?

whiteheads a fair point, although the lads only 19 and still has plenty of time to break through. I don't subscribe to view that an academy product should automatically get a first team shot over someone we buy in. Should be earned based on performance. Worrincy has advantage of first team experience and he made a pretty good debut last night. Showed a decent turn of pass and was about on a par with matt cook performance wise. Not the finished article by any means but probably the better choice over whitehead for the first team at the moment.

: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:57 pm  

mat wrote:

worrincy isnt blocking steve crossley's path to first team. worrincys a 2nd row, crossleys a prop.

Yes he is if one of the props had been missing and Langley and Sol hadn't been injured Worriny would have stil being selected ahead of Crossley.

mat wrote:

Crossleys path is being blocked by burgess,lynch,scruton,kopczak and james, Would you genuinely say hes a better player at this point in time than any of those players and hence deserves there place in the pecking order.

No but you could play Burgess and James in the second row.

mat wrote:

whiteheads a fair point, although the lads only 19 and still has plenty of time to break through.

He won't when he has players like Worrincy in front of him.

mat wrote:

I don't subscribe to view that an academy product should automatically get a first team shot over someone we buy in.

I agree I wouldn't expect Crossley or Whitehead to be picked ahead of Menzies who looks class. But Worrincy isn't no Steve Menzies.

mat wrote:

Worrincy has advantage of first team experience and he made a pretty good debut last night.

A chance Whitehead won't get. Plus if you think he had a good debut your very easily pleased.

mat wrote:

Showed a decent turn of pass and was about on a par with matt cook performance wise.

If you think he was on par with Cook I'll have some of what you've been drinking.

mat wrote:

Not the finished article by any means but probably the better choice over whitehead for the first team at the moment.

At the age of 23 he should be better than he is also have you ever seen Whitehead play other than he Dewsbury friendly.