Deacon ? : Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:49 pm  

How did Deacon go today ? He does not seem to be doing it for you ?

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:14 pm  

said for a few years deacon is rubbish, and before people start saying i dont watch the bulls etc etc etc i watch them just as much as i watch the giants. im huddersfield and the lass is bradford.

i just think if bradford were to get 2 new half backs and a new hooker things would look much better for them, and i believe that has been the case for the last 2-3 years.

deacon has no pace, no kicking game, no passing game and no tackling techniqe! infact all he can do is kick goals.

he used to be many bulls fans heros so to speak, it now seems alot of bulls are turning on him.

Re: Deacon ? : Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:48 pm  

Rhino Roy wrote:

How did Deacon go today ? He does not seem to be doing it for you ?

He ran into Shenton and came off worse.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Deacon ? : Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:49 pm  

invmatt wrote:

He ran into Shenton and came off worse.

Why was the incident put on report do you think?

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:52 pm  

because allthough it was a perfectly legal tackle, deacon had blood coming from his head/mouth....was put on report as mr hewer didnt see it clearly, (like most things today) didnt even give bradford a penalty, not that one was warranted

Re: Deacon ? : Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:53 pm  

Shaggoth wrote:

Why was the incident put on report do you think?

Not sure why as the actual tackle was fine, Shenton went running in 1 on 1 and collided with Deacon. The RFL will chalk it off during the week.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:53 pm  

Nothing wrong with the tackle.

[Pumpetypump]

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:56 pm  

Fair enough. I didn't think there was anything in it at the time but I was miles away so couldn't really tell.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:01 pm  

Listning to Shenny now he says nothing wrong with tackle, says he expects it to be pushed aside.

[Pumpetypump]

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:06 pm  

LewisJ23 wrote:

Listning to Shenny now he says nothing wrong with tackle, says he expects it to be pushed aside.

What about the other incident up at the Bulls end? Any idea what that was for?

I realise I sound like a blind git but I couldn't work that one out either.